We gotta be honest here: when the substantive portion of an opinion (even an opinion about takings and exactions) begins with, “Congress created the Enterprises to, inter alia, provide liquidity to the mortgage market…” our eyes kind of glaze over. It’s going to be one of those opinions.
But we soldiered on, and slogged
After a two-year absence in which we went remote, in the last week of last month (our usual spot on the calendar, between the playoffs and Super Bowl), we once again met in-person for the American Law Institute-CLE Eminent Domain and Land Valuation Litigation Conference.
Approximately 200 lawyers, judges, legal scholars, appraisers, law students
Before we go further into the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Ballinger v. City of Oakland, No. 19-16-550 (Feb. 2, 2022), this disclosure: this is a case in which our law firm represents the property owners. So take that into account as you read our take on the case.
The Ballingers own a home
If you ever get the opportunity to teach in a law school — either as a full-time legal scholar, or part-time as an expert adjunct practitioner — take it if you can. You might think you know a lot about a particular subject, but there’s nothing like spending time at the lectern in a law
Back in February, we were honored to be part of the University of Hawaii Law Review’s symposium “25 Years of PASH,” a retrospective of one of the Hawaii Supreme Court’s most famous (or infamous) decisions, Pub. Access Shoreline Haw. v. Haw. Cnty. Plan. Comm’n, 79 Haw. 425, 903 P.2d 1246 (1993), cert. denied
Check out the U.S. Court of Appeals’ opinion in F.P. Development, LLC v. Charter Twp. of Canton, No. 20-1147 (Oct. 13, 2021), in which the court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the property owner on its unconstitutional conditions takings claim.
Short story: Canton’s tree ordinance prohibits property owners from removing
There’s still plenty of time to register and join us for the 18th Annual Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference at the William and Mary Law School, Thursday and Friday, September 30 and October 1, 2021.
Yes, you may attend in-person, or remotely. The registration fees are very reasonable, ranging from $0 (yes, free!) to $200
Check this out. A short online comment at the Yale Journal on Regulation by Judge Thomas Griffith, “A New Test Or Merely A New Name For Some Regulatory Takings?“
The comment addresses the notion that the Supreme Court in Cedar Point shuffled up takings doctrine:
Much of the commentary about the Supreme
All the topics you want to know about, presented by top-notch faculty from across the nation. Sessions include:
You’ve got big dreams, you want fame…
If so, here’s your chance: two (2!) Takings Maven Dream Jobs® are now available.
Pacific Legal Foundation requesting applications for positions as a Property Rights Constitutional Litigator. Job description includes “You will find and win the next important Supreme Court property rights case.”
