Here’s one we’ve been meaning to post for a while. In Borough of Seaside Park v. Shree Jyoti, LLC, No. 089599 (N.J. Aug. 10, 2026), the New Jersey Supreme Court held that a municipality is not required to identify the specific public use in an ordinance authorizing the taking of private property. It’s enough that there is a public use. It’s up to…
Continue Reading NJ: Just Because A Taking Must Have A Public Use And The Govt Should Have Let The Public Know, Doesn’t Mean The Condemnor Must Actually State The Public Use
