Latest Post
20151205_145921

Really CAFED, “Right of Way” Means Fee Simple Absolute?

In Barron v. United States, No. 2025-1179 (Oct. 22, 2026), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Court of Federal Claims’ rejection of property owners’ takings claims arising out of the conversion of a 7.68-mile stretch of a former rail line in Florida to recreational trail use.

Continue Reading Really CAFED, “Right of Way” Means Fee Simple Absolute?
Recent Posts
WN_CT_APP_SEAL

Owner Plausibly Alleged Seattle’s Rental Regulations Are Penn Central And Physical Takings

MC 1215 art XXVIII

Magna Carta Pilgrimage, Part Duo

clouds2

SCOTUS Denies Two Takings Petitions, But Leaves Tantalizing Clues

UW seal

CA9: When Deciding Whether A Public University Is A Section 1983 “Person,” Eminent Domain Power Is A Big Clue

All Posts >

Property Rights
MC 1215 art XXVIII

Magna Carta Pilgrimage, Part Duo

clouds2

SCOTUS Denies Two Takings Petitions, But Leaves Tantalizing Clues

View More Posts
Takings
clouds2

SCOTUS Denies Two Takings Petitions, But Leaves Tantalizing Clues

logo_seal_jot

Owner Does Not Actually Own Disputed Property, But That Doesn’t Affect The Takings Claim

View More Posts
Land Use
1stDCA-seal.99c21d5a

Between Scylla And Charybdis: Your Lucas Claim May Be Too Early … Or Too Late

PXL_20260915_191053076~2

New(ish) Article: Adam J. MacLeod, “Vested Rights and the Presumption of Lawful Use,” 2 Tex. A & M J. of Law & Civil Governance (2026)

View More Posts
Events & Conferences
PXL_20261013_153927495

Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference, London: Honouring The Work Of Professor James Penner

PXL_20260915_175028366

“Unpacking Private Property’s Bundle of Sticks” Symposium Report

View More Posts

Subscribe to inversecondemnation.com

Subscribe by Email
View More Posts