The bottom line in Hernandez-Castrodad v. Steidel-Figueroa, No. 23-1872 (July 1, 2026), is that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the dismissal of the plaintiffs’ takings claims, although it had at least partially different reasons than the district court.
First, let’s get to the district court’s reasoning. The takings claim stem from Puerto Rico’s practice of skimming some of…
Continue Reading CA1: Claim That Administrative “Cut” Of Just Compensation Deposits Is A Taking Were Stayed By Puerto Rico Bankruptcy
