If you were looking for deep clarity from the Justices about land use law and whether a legislature imposing monetary conditions on property development always gets the free judicial pass of rational basis review in this morning’s oral arguments in Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, you may not discover a lot of predictive
Regulatory takings
What We’re Reading Today, Property Rights Edition

Bismarck in January is looking pretty good.
Here’s what we’re reading today:
- Christian Britschgi, Court’s Wild Zoning Decision Blocks ‘Montana Miracle’, Reason (Jan. 2, 2024) (“In an eyebrow-raising decision, a Montana judge has halted the implementation of two laws legalizing duplexes and accessory dwelling units on residential land across the state, writing that they’d
…
Sheetz v. El Dorado County Argument Preview: Do Blanket Exactions Present The Same Risk As Ad Hoc Exactions?
Get ready for Sheetz v. El Dorado County, No. 22-1074, the “legislative exactions” case at the Supreme Court. [Disclosure: this is one of our firm’s cases, so we won’t be doing an analysis here. Besides, you already know where we stand on the issue.]
Takings Pilgrimage: Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Today
As you may remember, from time to time we’ve visited the sites of well-known dirt law cases. Kaiser Aetna, Loretto, Mahon, PruneYard, Chicago Burlington, the High Line, Dolan, Nollan, Seneca Village, and Hadacheck are the ones that readily come to mind.
Yes, we have a lot…
2023 Year-End Clean Up
As 2023 comes to a close, here are a few of the decisions that we wanted to blog about, but didn’t have the time.
- Bruce v. Ogden City Corp., No. 22-4114 (10th Cir. Dec. 1, 2023): city demolishing a building that was damaged by fire was not a Lucas taking because the owner
…
Cases And Links From Today’s ABA State & Local Govt Law Land Use Presentation
Here are the cases that Michael Berger and I discussed in today’s presentation to the ABA State and Local Government Law Section’s Land Use group. It was good seeing everyone, even virtually:
- Sheetz v. County of El Dorado – are legislatively-imposed exactions subject to the nexus and proportionality requirements of Nollan/Dolan? (SCOTUS)
- Devillier v.
…
Professor Ely: Regulatory Takings Didn’t Begin With Pennsylvania Coal v. Mahon
A must-read from Professor James Ely, “to protect all the essential elements of ownership:” Late Nineteenth Century Emergence of the Regulatory Takings Doctrine, 13 Brigham-Kanner Prop. Rts. J. ___ (forthcoming 2024).
Professor Ely, who presented this paper at the recent Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference, lays out the case that the regulatory takings…
Listen: Gideon Kanner’s Oral Arguments, Agins v. City of Tiburon (Apr. 15, 1980)

The place hasn’t changed that much since 1980, has it?
As you know, the legendary Gideon Kanner left us in November. The tributes continue to be published. You’ve no doubt seen our remembrance of Professor K, as well as this one from Southern California Appellate News, this memorial from Loyola Law, our…
Hawaii Federal Court: Honolulu Can’t Increase Minimum Rental Term To 90 Days Without Accommodating Existing Uses
Here’s the latest in a case we’ve been following.
In this Order, the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii made permanent its earlier ruling that Honolulu’s ordinance which expanded the minimum rental term to 90 days because it did not account for those owners who were already legally renting their properties …
Hawaii Five-80: More Land Use (Law 580) At The University Of Hawaii
Starting in January, we’ll be helping our friend and former law partner Mark M. Murakami with the venerated and oh-so-important Land Use course (Law 580) at the University of Hawaii’s Law School.
We’re temporarily stepping into some mighty big slippers (this is Hawaii, so we don’t always wear shoes), as this is the course that…




