You can spend all your time making money.
You can spend all your love making time.
If it all fell to pieces tomorrow, would you still be mine?
Count me as very surprised, and a bit saddened, when earlier this week my inbox pinged with notification that the latest episode of Clint Schumacher’s Eminent Domain
In Brinkmann v. Town of Southold, No. 22-2722 (Mar. 13, 2024), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit addressed a longstanding issue left unresolved by the Supreme Court in Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005): is it enough that a condemnor’s professed use qualifies as a public
Texans: now is a good time to register for the 23d Annual Texas Eminent Domain Superconference, April 25-26, 2024, at the Austin Country Club in Austin.
We spoke at the Conference last year and in other editions, and can report that it is excellent. Check out the faculty and agenda, and then register
Save the date (and time): next Wednesday, March 6, 2024, at 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, as we rejoin our friends and colleagues Patrick McAllister and Beth Smith, as they co-host the Eminent Domain and Right of Way Club.
We’ll be joining them to try and answer that question, “What is Inverse Condemnation?” As Patrick
When it comes to the longstanding ALI-CLE American Law Institute-CLE Eminent Domain and Land Valuation Litigation Conferences, we’re always ready to go. You know that. But this year’s version — the 41st — was buzzing like no other in recent memory.
Maybe it was the New Orleans venue with its atmo, food, and music for
The historic Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Here’s the latest in a somewhat strange case we’ve been following about what happens after a court determines that a taking lacks a public use — but the condemnor goes ahead and just seizes the property anyway.
The Town of Apex, North Carolina, sought to take an easement
If you dream such dreams as this photo, read on.
My law firm, Pacific Legal Foundation, is on the hunt for lawyer to join our Property Rights group (yours truly is the Director of Property Rights Litigation, so you will be working with me and the other takings and con law mavens in our practice).
A quick one from the South Carolina Supreme Court.
In Applied Building Sciences, Inc. v. South Carolina Dep’t of Commerce, No. 28184 (Jan. 17, 2024), the court held that the $50,000 cap on relocation benefits provided to ABS by South Carolina’s version of the Relocation Act was enough, and did not deprive ABS of
One week ago today, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Devillier v. Texas.
We wrote up our thoughts in this post, “Rogue States: Today’s Argument In Devillier v. Texas – ‘Aren’t the Courts supposed to do something’ About Violations Of The Constitution?,” and now bring you other reports:
Don’t miss out!
We promise: this is the last time we’re going to try to entice you to the upcoming ALI-CLE Eminent Domain & Land Valuation Litigation Conference in New Orleans. We are getting close to capacity, but there is still room. In recent years, we have standing room only in the Conference halls, and