One week ago today, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Devillier v. Texas.
We wrote up our thoughts in this post, “Rogue States: Today’s Argument In Devillier v. Texas – ‘Aren’t the Courts supposed to do something’ About Violations Of The Constitution?,” and now bring you other reports:
- Niina H. Farah, “Supreme Court leans toward landowners in Texas flooding case” (Politico E&E News) (we were quoted in this piece: “Robert Thomas, director of property rights litigation at the Pacific Legal Foundation, said critiques of Texas appeared to cut across the ideological spectrum on the court. ‘Even those justices who you might not usually think of as viewing property rights favorably, they didn’t seem to appreciate what I would call the gamesmanship [from Texas],’ said Thomas, who wrote a friend of the court brief to the Supreme Court in support of landowners.).
- Lydia Wheeler, “Supreme Court Struggles with Right to Sue in Property Fight” (Bloomberg Law)
- Jess Huff, “U.S. Supreme Court hears Texas case that could change how states compensate landowners for their property” (Texas Tribune)
- David Holtzman, “High Court Skeptical Of Texas’ Defense In Takings Case“
- Derek Fleming, “SCOTUS Case from TX Could Alter Eminent Domain Law” (Dallas Express)
- Todd Neeley, “Texas Landowners Case Argued at SCOTUS” (Progressive Farmer)
Check em out.