Well, that was quick. As reported here (“HECO Kept The Power Flowing In Lahaina Even As Poles Toppled“), we’ve already seen the first lawsuit filed seeking recovery for the Maui wildfire that destroyed Lahaina town — a class action even before there’s been any official word about what caused or contributed to the
Washington: “The right to inverse condemnation belongs to the property owner at the time of the taking; the right does not pass to a subsequent purchaser unless expressly conveyed.”
In Masloka v. Public Utility District No. 1, No. 101241-1 (Aug. 3, 2023), the Washington Supreme Court held that a takings claim did not automatically transfer to a new property owner when the property was sold.
Your first reaction might be like ours, “what about Palazzolo!?” Didn’t that case say that transfer of
Still Time To Join Us Wed Aug 9: ALI-CLE’s “How Did Property Rights Fare at the Supreme Court? What Happened in the 2022 Term and What’s Next”
Tomorrow, Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 1:00 – 2:00 p.m. (Eastern Time), please join us for ALI-CLE’s web program, “How Did Property Rights Fare at the Supreme Court? What Happened in the 2022 Term and What’s Next.”
Here’s the course description:
This has been a blockbuster U.S. Supreme Court term for property
Recognizing A Property Rights Icon: “Mentors, A Path to Fairness, and the Joy of Taking”
We recently attended the American Bar Association’s Annual Meeting in Denver to speak at the Section of State and Local Government Law’s program, “The 100th Anniversary of Pennsylvania Coal v. Mahon: How the Takings Clause Became the Primary Check on Government Power When SCOTUS Abandoned Review Under the Due Process and Contracts Clauses
Live The Dream! Teach Dirt Law In Hawaii: UH Law School Looking For Property & Land Use Lawprof
(Tip for applicants: understanding the symbology of the
Law School’s logo will show you know the score.)
Here’s your chance to teach Property and Land Use in what might be most interesting venue on Planet Earth for those subjects: the University of Hawaii School of Law has put out a call for applications for
What If The Hawaii Governor’s Cutting Of The Gordian Land Use/Environmental Knot Actually Works?
The two-plus years under the declared Co-19 emergency surely have given Hawaii’s executive-branch officials a clear vision of how much easier they could get their agendas accomplished without all that pesky democracy.
Hawaii’s Sweeping Emergency Management Act: Governor is the “Sole Judge”
Hawaii’s Emergency Management Act gives state and county executives broad and nearly unreviewable
New Article – “Necessity Exceptions to Takings” (Shelley Ross Saxer)
Worth checking out: a new article from Pepperdine Law School’s Shelley Ross Saxer, published in the University of Hawaii Law Review, “Necessity Exceptions to Takings,” 44 U. Haw. L. Rev. 60 (2022). [Disclosure: as noted in the author’s note, we reviewed an earlier draft of the piece and provided some thoughts.]
CA11’s Eminent Domain Attorneys Fees Ruling Is Controlled By Prior Panel
The Eleventh Circuit’s short opinion (really short – 1.5 pages) in Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC v. 3-921 Acres of Land, No. 22-10435 (July 25, 2023), is straightforward: to resolve whether a Florida property owner subject to a private condemnor taking under the federal Natural Gas Act has a property right in attorneys fees and
Ohio S Ct Rejects Attempt To Import Regulatory Takings Ripeness Into Physical Takings
A short (but interesting) one from the Ohio Supreme Court. In State ex rel. Balunek v. Marchbanks, No. 2021-1469 (July 25, 2023), the court held that a physical takings claim alleging the DOT cut off access to property was ripe, even though the owner might have applied for permit to gain access.
As part
Tuesday Property Round-Up (International Edition)
Here’s what we’re reading today:
- Timothy Harris, Backwards Federalism: The Withering Importance of State Property Law in Modern Takings Jurisprudence, 75 Rutgers L. Rev. ___ (2023) (“Modern Supreme Court Fifth Amendment takings cases have – paradoxically — diminished the role and importance of state law. Doing so creates uncertainty and unpredictability in determining where