That’s right: Clint Schumacher’s Eminent Domain Podcast has reached its 100th episode. Very impressive, Clint!
And for this “very special episode,” Clint was kind enough to ask us to return to celebrate. In a wide-ranging hour-plus chat, Clint and I talked property rights and takings of course, but also hit on several
We spoke on the second panel of the day at the 2022 Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference at the William and Mary Law School. The subject of our panel — which included Professors David Callies, Tim Mulvaney, and Dave Owen — was “Reshaping the Framework Protecting Property Under the Roberts Court.“
Here’s a rough
The facts of the Connecticut Appellate Court’s opinion in Schaghticoke Tribal Nation v. Connecticut, No. AC 43811 (Sep. 27, 2022), really stand out.
Back in the day — and we mean waaaaay back in the day — as in 1801! — the State of Connecticut sold some land which in 1752 (!) the Colony
Coulda been worse.
When the Third Circuit’s published opinion in Yaw v. Delaware River Basin Comm’n, No. 21-2316 (Sep. 16, 2022) popped up in our feed we got a slight frisson in anticipation – a claim that the Commission’s banning of fracking was a taking.Thank you Knick for opening the federal courts
Clint Schumacher’s Eminent Domain podcast is one of those things that we almost shouldn’t post about. After all, every episode is worth your time. But this one is especially good. After all, it features our law firm colleague and friend Jon Houghton, discussing what you all know is one of our fave topics, regulatory
One last reminder that there’ still time to register for the upcoming Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference at the William and Mary Law School in Williamsburg, Virginia, September 29-30, 2022. If you can’t make it to the historic campus, there’s an option to attend remotely.
In our opinion, the Conference is the best of its kind
A short one (unpublished) from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, considering an issue we’ve been following: what is the effect of the government’s claim that it is regulating property for what looks like a valid “police power” purpose?
As noted, that’s a road we’ve been down before. Here’s a sampling:
Here’s your must-read for today, a new article from U. Va. lawprof Julia D. Mahoney, “Cedar Point Nursery and the End of the New Deal Settlement.”
Disclosure: we show up in footnote * along with others for offering “comments and conversations” about the piece.
Here’s the Abstract:
In Cedar Point Nursery v.
The facts are pretty straightforward in the U.S. Court of Appeals’ opinion in Frein v. Pennsylvania State Police, No. 21-1830 (Aug. 30, 2022):
Eric Matthew Frein is on death row for cold-blooded murder. In 2014, he ambushed two Pennsylvania State Troopers, killing one and injuring the other. For a while, he evaded capture. Police
You remember that case we posted recently, from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in which the court granted summary judgment to a property owner after the city police damaged her home in the course of the police’s apprehension of a suspect. The court rejected the Tenth Circuit’s rationale in a