Here are the final briefs in the cert process in a case we’ve been following.
In In Guerin v. Fowler, 899 F.3d 1112 (9th Cir. 2018), a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit held that Washington state officials’ failure to return daily interest that was allegedly skimmed from the plaintiffs’ state-managed retirement accounts could
Today, we’re featuring a post written by our Tennessee colleague, economist William Wade. He writes about the Massachusetts Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Smyth v. Conservation Comm’n of Falmouth, and the more recent cert petition in that case. Bill writes and comments frequently on takings cases. See, e.g., William W.
Here’s the Brief in Opposition in a case (and issue) we’ve been tracking for a while (including filing several amicus briefs along the way, including this one). The BIO is the pipeline’s response to the cert petition on the question of whether
Brief in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari, Givens v. Mountain
The final agenda and faculty list will soon be officially published, but we wanted to give you a preview of what is in store at the ALI-CLE Eminent Domain and Land Valuation Litigation Conference, January 23-25, 2020, at the Nashville Hilton (downtown, just a few steps away from everything that Nashville has to offer).
Don’t
You know where this is.
Here’s the cert petition filed recently in a case we’ve been tracking. (See also this guest post by economist Bill Wade about that case.)
As the above photo tells you, this one is going into what may the last truly unexplored frontier of regulatory takings law, the details
Here’s what we are reading this Tuesday:
We’re about to get underway with the fall semester at William and Mary Law School, where we’re again teaching an upper-division course, Eminent Domain and Property Rights.
We’ve more than doubled the size of last year’s enrollment, so it looks like the word is getting out. We cover not only eminent domain and
Check this out. What at first appears to be something along the lines of the grainy Zapruder film (this particular piece was recorded on video, not film, and certainly well before the days of high-res camera phones that we now take for granted) is an important piece of takings history.
It is (the late) Anthony
Here’s our Federalist Society blog post on Knick, “After More Than 30 Years, the Supreme Court Reopens the Door To Federal Takings Claims.”
Check it out, takings fans.
Don’t worry, you didn’t miss the U.S. Supreme Court issuing a major eminent domain case. Today’s post is about a decidedly older decision, Danforth v. United States, 308 U.S. 271 (1939).
The reason we’re posting this decision now, eighty years after it was issued, is that a colleague recently passed on a note with