Super Takings (or Due Process) Nerd alert: what should-be-famous-but-isn’t SCOTUS case involved what is now this property?
Extra credit: why is the case important?
Location clues are all in photo.
Answer and more details is a subsequent post.
ABA State And Local Govt Law Section – 2017-18 Chair’s Report: The Year of Living Creatively
My year as the Chair of the ABA’s Section of State and Local Government Law is coming to a close. I’m in Chicago this week at the Annual Meeting, ready to hand over the gavel to my colleague, friend, and successor, Ron Kramer. Below is my 2017-18 report on the Section’s highs and lows
Federal Govt: Reject Williamson County! Property Owners Whose Property Is Taken By Local Governments Should Be Able To Enforce Fifth Amendment Rights In A Federal Forum
We already knew from its amicus brief brief that the federal government supported the property owner in Knick v. Township of Scott, No. 17-647, the case in which the US. Supreme Court agreed to review the continuing validity of the “state procedures” rule of Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. Hamilton Bank, 473
What Might A Justice Kavanaugh Mean For Takings, Land Use, And Other Issues?
Clare Trapasso has a Realtor.com piece on what a Justice Kavanaugh could mean for real estate, property, and land use issues, “What Supreme Court Nominee Brett Kavanaugh Could Mean for Real Estate,” where she correctly notes that “while commentators have been scrutinizing Kavanaugh’s record on hot-button topics like abortion and immigration, there’s been
Vermont: Sewage Backup Wasn’t Permanent, Therefore No Taking
The City’s sewage pipe backed up into several residences. The City has known for decades that these pipes were “cracked, structurally unsound, and that they had significant root intrusion.” The City took measures, but apparently these were not enough, and after “an extremely intense rain and hail storm,” three million gallons of wastewater overflowed into
New Cert Petition: Legislatively-Imposed Exactions Subject To Nollan-Dolan-Koontz?
Here’s one that’s been a long time coming (or coming back, more accurately).
In this recently-filed cert petition, the issue is whether an “exaction” imposed by the legislature should be subject to the nexus and rough proportionality requirements of Nollan, Dolan, and Koontz, or is merely subject to rational basis review (i.e.
Links And Materials From Today’s Transportation Research Board Session
Here are the cases and other items I either spoke about or mentioned at today’s Transportation Research Board‘s 57th Annual Workshop on Transportation Law in Cambridge, Massachusetts:
- The Colorado public use cases: public use vs. public purpose: Lafayette and Carousel Farms
- On the Supreme Court docket: Violet Dock Port (SCOTUS, Louisiana)
- The Louisiana Supreme
SCOTUS Amici Brief: Kelo Revisited – Louisiana Case Is An Opportunity To Clarify Eminent Domain Pretext
Here’s the amici brief we’re filing in an important Public Use case we’ve been following.
In St. Bernard Port, Harbor & Terminal District v. Violet Dock Port, Inc., No. 2017-C-0434 (Jan. 30, 2017), the Louisiana Supreme Court upheld the taking by the St. Bernard Port, Harbor, and Terminal District of a Mississippi River docking facility
Honolulu’s Sidewalk Obstruction Prohibition Goes Island-Wide
Honolulu’s homeless problem is a tough nut to crack. There are no easy answers. People have rights, even if that means they have the freedom to live outside. But when a walk out the door of your downtown office becomes an exercise in dodging human waste, poor unfortunates in various stages of mental illness
Colorado Supreme Court To Review Major Eminent Domain Case: Does Public Use Save A Taking From A Private Purpose?
The Colorado Supreme Court has agreed to review a public use case we’ve been following with keen interest, Carousel Farms Metropolitan District, No. 18SC30 (July 2, 2018), one we noted was the “most interesting” such case of 2017.
The Court of Appeals held that the actual purpose of the taking was private, so