Dirt Law

Subscribe to Dirt Law via RSS
PXL_20221218_214724672.MP

Too busy writing those briefs and petitioning for those writs, so haven’t found the time to hit your local store or the interwebs and fulfill your seasonal duties? Or maybe you just have gifter’s block this holiday season about an appropriate present for the dirt lawyer in your life?

You want to be known as a a good gifter, not a grifter.

Fear not, friend. Here’s our annual Holiday Dirt Lawyer Gift Guide, with our suggestions for things that could make the DL in your life happy. Some serious, some cheeky. You figure out which applies.

Let’s go!

* * * *

Bespoke Property Rights Rickroll Mug.

We’ll start with a new entry, one that is sure to become a favorite. We’re not quite sure what to call it, so we’ve settled on “Property Rights Rickroll Mug.”

For those of you who remember, fondly or otherwise, the…

Continue Reading SCOTUS Origami Boulders, Bundles Of Sticks, Lumps Of (Pennsylvania) Coal, And Bags O’ Dirt: Presenting Your 2025 Dirt Lawyer Holiday Gift Guide (Including Last-Minute Entries)

Euclid_front

Tomorrow, November 22, 2025 is the 99th anniversary of the day in 1926 when the United States Supreme Court issued its landmark opinion in Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 (Nov. 22, 1926).

You know this one (and can you call yourself a dirt lawyer if you don’t?). It’s the one in which the Supreme Court first upheld — against a facial due process challenge — the validity of this thing we now call “Euclidean zoning.”

In the intervening century, zoning has become a catch-all term for all sorts of regulatory restrictions on the uses of real property, land users know that “zoning” — ackshually — refers only to the regulation and separation of uses, restrictions on density, and height regulation. At least that’s how it began. The Euclid court concluded this was mostly nuisance prevention, so no worries. But we’d…

Continue Reading You Don’t Look A Day Over 98, Euclid

As we wrap up another year, it’s time to look ahead to the one event that always gets our eminent domain blood pumping: the annual ALI-CLE Eminent Domain and Land Valuation Litigation Conference. Details, including faculty list, a complete agenda, and registration information is posted here.

Now in its 43rd year, this flagship gathering remains the undisputed national hub for practitioners, academics, appraisers, and anyone else who lives and breathes property rights law. Mark your calendars for January 22-24, 2026, when we’ll convene at the JW Marriott Plant Riverside District in Savannah, Georgia. Think historic charm meets Southern hospitality, with moss-draped oaks, riverfront vibes, and enough ghost tours to inspire a dozen inverse condemnation hypotheticals. (For those of you who prefer pixels to palm trees, a live webcast option is available.)

What makes this conference indispensable? For starters, it’s the place to reconnect and talk shop with the…

Continue Reading Savannah Bound: Don’t Miss The 43rd ALI-CLE Eminent Domain & Land Valuation Litigation Conference (Jan. 22-24, 2026)

An interesting dirt law decision from north of the border in a case we’ve been following.

In Kosicki v. City of Toronto, No. 40908 (Sep. 19, 2025), the Supreme Court of Canada held that the usual common law rule of “no adverse possession against the government” didn’t govern, and permitted a private owner to do just that.

We can’t say we understand fully the decision as we have not been “called to the Bar” in Canada, but since our legal systems have a common legal ancestor, we can understand enough to get the story.

Here’s how the majority framed the issue:

[1] The issue in this appeal is whether the appellants, Pawel Kosicki and Megan Munro, can succeed in their claim for possessory title under the Real Property Limitations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. L.15 (“RPLA”). Since 2017, the appellants have jointly owned a residential property…

Continue Reading Cour suprême du Canada: Private Owner May Adversely Possess Public Land

Yes, the mysterious ducks remain — and seem to have multiplied.

It’s that time of the year again. Fall’s-a-coming, and that means that starting today, we’re back at the William and Mary Law School in Williamsburg, Virginia to teach two courses:

  • Eminent Domain and Property Rights (W&M is one of the few law schools in the country that offer a course in eminent domain, just compensation, and takings)
  • Land Use Controls (an especially hot topic at the moment)

The registration numbers for both courses are good (really good), and two full classrooms of Dirt Law goodness tells us something about this area of law — it’s really interesting, and a good place to make your way in the practice, and law students recognize that.

PXL_20240819_121031630.MP
We don’t use $400 casebooks in either class.

Time to jack back into the (takings and land use) Matrix.

6a00d83451707369e20240a476d216200c-800wi
Continue Reading Back To School For Dirt Law @ William & Mary, Season 8

BK2025

That’s right, it’s time to plan on joining us at the 22d edition of the best one-day property law conference, William and Mary Law School‘s Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference.

As we noted, Professor William Fischel will be awarded the 2025 Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Prize at the annual Wren Building candlelight ceremony in Williamsburg on October 23, with the following day being devoted to a celebration of his work and career, and discussions of the hot topics in property rights law.

The Conference is expressly designed to get legal academics and the nation’s best dirt law practitioners in the same room, discussion how legal scholarship and law practice work hand-in-hand to shape the law. 

More details:  

The Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Prize is presented annually to a scholar, practitioner, or jurist whose work affirms the fundamental importance of property rights. It is named in honor of the late Toby Prince…

Continue Reading Registration Open: 22d Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference, Oct. 23-24, 2025, Williamsburg

Rethinking
Available now. 

Just published: Rethinking the Law of Private Property, edited by lawprof Jan Laitos, with chapters by some of Dirt Law’s most notable luminaries. Here’s the abstract:

In Rethinking the Law of Private Property, eminent legal scholars consider how private property rights might be transformed and realigned to better cope with modern challenges. They rethink current paradigms around private property and natural resource ownership in light of police power regulations, health rules and expanded land-use regulations.

Vicki Been, Daniel Cole, Robin Craig, Richard Epstein, Jan Laitos, Roger Pilon, J.B. Ruhl, James Salzman and Ilya Somin are among America’s leading scholars on private property rights. Their chapters consider three critical issues facing private property owners in the 21st century. (1) To what extent may constitutional protections of private property resist police power limits restricting property uses? (2) Do developers of property for housing have the ability to provide affordable…

Continue Reading New Book: Rethinking the Law of Private Property (J. Laitos, ed. 2025)

Bundle of Sticks

What is private property? James Madison called it “that dominion which one man claims and exercises over the external things of the world, in exclusion of every other individual.” The Constitution’s Takings Clause doesn’t define it; it simply prohibits the taking of private property for public use without just compensation.

In this academic workshop – to be held in November 2025 – Pacific Legal Foundation seeks scholarly papers exploring the other sources of private property and how they should be used to define private property rights protected by the Takings Clause.

The U.S. Supreme Court has recently re-explored what property rights are protected under the Constitution in Tyler v. Hennepin County, where the Court unanimously held that home equity was a property right protected by the Takings Clause. Since the Constitution does not define private property, the Court explained, in Tyler, that private property can be defined by…

Continue Reading “Unpacking Private Property’s Bundle Of Sticks” – Call For Proposals

Kelo site Ft Trumbull
Over there is where the “little pink house” was.
July 26, 2025.

Regular readers know that from time to time, we make what we call property or takings pilgrimages to the sites of famous cases. Inter alia: Kaiser Aetna, Nollan, Dolan, Loretto, Penn Central, Hadacheck, the High Line, Boomer.

Included in that are eminent domain cases of course, including Chicago Burlington, and Berman. 

With the recent 20th anniversary of Kelo v. City of New London just past, we thought it appropriate to revisit the site when we were in the neighborhood to see what’s up and what “progress,” if any, New London has made in effecting those plans it claimed to have, which necessitated the taking of Susette Kelo’s “little pink house.” For Professor Gideon Kanner’s thoughts on “Eminent Domain Projects That Didn’t Work Out…

Continue Reading Property Rights Pilgrimage: The Kelo Property And House, Twenty Years On