Court of Federal Claims | Federal Circuit

20181002_154246_HDR (1)

Last week, the 15th Annual Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference saw the gathering of legal scholars, judges, lawyers, and law students at the William and Mary Law School to award the B-K Property Rights Prize to Cardozo lawprof Stewart Sterk, followed by a day-long conference focusing on Professor Sterk’s work and the latest developments in property

Our colleague and co-planning chair Joe Waldo was in town yesterday, so we walked through historic Williamsburg, Virginia (cradle of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights), to invite you to join us for the 36th Annual ALI-CLE Eminent Domain & Land Valuation Litigation Conference (January 24-26, 2019, in Palm Springs, California).

As we wrote

MRGO

Here’s the cert petition we’ve been waiting to drop in a case we’ve been following closely

Last we checked in, the Federal Circuit (any guess on which judge?) held that the catastropic Katrina flooding — caused mostly by the federal government’s construction and maintenance of a navigation project, the Mississippi River Gulf-Outlet

20180126_111558_HDR

You’ve known for a while that Palm Springs, California, specifically the Renaissance Palm Springs Hotel (a resort facility, but right in town, so you will have many options for “off campus” activities like art museums, the aerial tram, golf, and whatever suits your fancy, and close-in to the Palm Springs Airport), is the venue

Here’s what we are reading (or listening to) this Tuesday:

20180717_135234_HDR

Here are the cases and other items I either spoke about or mentioned at today’s Transportation Research Board‘s 57th Annual Workshop on Transportation Law in Cambridge, Massachusetts:

The plaintiffs owned mining and homestead claims on land in the Santa Fe National Forest. They claimed they own easements to access these lands, recognized by federal statutes. The government said no, these are just access rights, not easements. 

Then a fire, followed by flooding which severely damaged the Forest Service roads which the plaintiffs

Here’s the latest in a case we’ve been following. In Alimanestianu v. United States, No. 17-1667 (May 7, 2018), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Court of Federal Claims’ ruling rejecting takings liability for the government wiping out a money judgment in favor of terrorism victims against the Libyan

Here’s the latest in the Houston flood cases against the federal government asserting inverse condemnation, which we’ve been following. 

In this Opinion and Order, the Court of Federal Claims (Judge Lettow) rejected the Government’s motion to dismiss, deferring it until trial. If you want a quick rundown of the case, the

If you understand this post’s headline, congratulations: you are the nerdiest of law nerds, checking no less than two boxes in the obscure law category, takings and patent law.

But if you have been paying attention here, you know that recently, the Supreme Court, in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group