As we noted here, property owners sued the New York governor asserting that one of his emergency measures to respond to the coronavirus crisis (a suspension of eviction proceedings) is a taking.
Yesterday, the District Court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, and entered summary judgment in favor of the governor. Order Denying
The Supreme Court today declined to review a Tenth Circuit decision that held a municipality could not be liable for a taking when its police officers pretty much destroyed a house in the course of dislodging a suspect who had holed up there.
Along with our colleague Bill DeVinney, we filed an amicus brief in
Timothy Harris (Seattle U.) has posted his forthcoming article (Loyola L.A. L. Rev.) about takings and coronavirus shut downs. Well worth a read, and adds to the growing list of scholarly inquiry into the question, which includes Prof. Shai Stern’s “Pandemic Takings: Compensating for Public Health Emergency Regulation,” and our own “Evaluating
Here’s the recording of our webinar from earlier this week, in which we and fellow Honolulu lawyer Jeff Portnoy did our best to address some of the many questions that have arisen during the coronavirus shut-down.
Jeffrey Portnoy and Robert Thomas talked about what we can expect as the state and counties slowly lift
A long opinion, but a short post. In Stanford Vina Ranch Irrigation Co. v. California, No. C085762 (June 18, 2020), the California Court of Appeal held that water rights are not really property rights.
That’s a bit of an overstatement, of course. But not a huge one.
In an inverse condemnation case, the court
A new, must-add-to-your-reading-list article from takings and expropriations law scholar Professor Shai Stern.
In “Pandemic Takings: Compensating for Public Health Emergency Regulation,” Professor Stern dives into a question a lot of us have been pondering lately, namely whether the pandemic-related shutdown orders might trigger the Just Compensation imperative in the Fifth Amendment’s
Just published: the 2020 Zoning and Planning Law Handbook (Green Book). The first section of the Summary of Contents is about Takings, and includes as the lead piece Professor Gideon Kanner and Michael Berger’s tour-de-force article, “The Nasty, Brutish, and Short Life of Agins v. City of Tiburon.” It also includes
One more to add to your reading queue. The latest complaint alleges, among other claims, that the Illinois governor’s coronavirus shut down orders for businesses deemed “non-essential” result in takings.
The list of similar challenges keeps growing. See here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here,
Here’s the latest in a case we’ve been following (we visited the site last November with our William and Mary class), the property owners’ Opening Brief in a case being considered by the Virginia Supreme Court.
This is a case at the intersection of property and takings law, and environmental protection. Several Nansemond River oystermen
