Beginning at 9:00 a.m. Central Time today, the Texas Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Severance v. Patterson, No. 09-0378 (Nov. 5, 2010), the case in which the court held 6-2 that Texas does not recognize a “rolling” public beachfront access easement, without proof of prescription. In March, the court agreed to rehear the
Monday Round-Up
What we are reading today:
- Should the Courts Help Los Angeles Commit Fiscal Suicide? – Gideon Kanner’s takedown of the recent California Court of Appeal decision in City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court, No. B225082 (Apr. 12, 2011), which held that in order to make out a claim for inequitable precondemnation activities, the
7th Circuit Rejects Takings Claim On The Merits. But How?
Here’s Bettendorf v. St. Croix County, No. 10-1359 (Jan. 20, 2011) a 2-1 decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, another regulatory takings opinion we’ve been meaning to post for a while. The case involves a property owner’s claim that the county’s changing the zoning on his land from commercial
9th Circuit: Mobilehome Rent Control Takings Claim Too Early Or Too Late, Take Your Pick
In Colony Cove Properties, LLC v. City of Carson, No. 09-57039 (Mar. 28, 2011), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the District Court’s dismissal of a property owner’s claim that the City of Carson’s mobilehome rent control ordinance is a taking. The District Court dismissed the facial takings claim because
Vermont Law Review: Essay Reflections From The Amicus Curiae In The Judicial Takings Case
As we noted here (when we posted our article), the latest issue of the Vermont Law Review deals with the U.S. Supreme Court’s “judicial takings” case, Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Dep’t of Environmental Protection, 130 S.Ct. 2592 (June 17, 2010).
In eight essays, the authors of several of the many amicus
Cases And Links From Today’s Hawaii Land Use Conference Sessions On Coastal Issues And Water Law
To all of you who attended the first day of the Hawaii Land Use Conference today, thank you. As promised, here are the items I discussed during my two sessions:
- United States v. Milner, 583 F.3d 1174 (9th Cir. 2009) – the case in which the Ninth Circuit affirmed a finding of common law
En Banc 9th Circuit Decides Guggenheim: Mobile Home Rent Control Ordinance Is Not A Regulatory Taking
This just in: the en banc Ninth Circuit, in an opinion by Judge Kleinfeld (the dissenter from the panel opinion) has concluded that the City of Goleta’s mobile home rent control ordinance is not a regulatory taking. In Guggenheim v. City of Goleta, No. 06-56306 (Dec. 22, 2010), the majority “assumed without deciding” that
Cert Denied In Hawaii Beach Taking Case
The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to review Maunalua Bay Beach Ohana 28 v. State of Hawaii, 122 Haw. 34, 222 P.3d 441 (Haw. Ct. App. 2009). That’s the case in which the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals concluded that ownership of beachfront property includes only a partial right to accreted land.
The ICA
Another Amicus Brief In Columbia Eminent Domain Case: Redevelopment Takings “[D]isproportionately impact … racial and ethnic minorities.”
New York State Senator Bill Perkins has filed an amicus brief in Tuck-It-Away, Inc. v. New York State Urban Dev. Corp., No. 10-402 (cert. petition filed Sep. 21, 2010), the case in which upper Manhattan property owners have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the decision of the New York Court of Appeals
Amicus Brief In Columbia Eminent Domain Case: What Level Of Scrutiny Does Kelo Require?
The Pacific Legal Foundation has filed an amicus brief in Tuck-It-Away, Inc. v. New York State Urban Dev. Corp., No. 10-402 (cert. petition filed Sep. 21, 2010), the case in which upper Manhattan property owners have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the decision of the New York Court of Appeals in the