Last week, we filed the ABA’s amicus brief in Filarksy v. Delia, No. 10-1018 (cert. granted Sep. 27, 2011), the case in which the U.S. Supreme Court is considering whether a private lawyer hired by a local government is entitled to claim the same immunities from section 1983 lawsuits as his government-employed counterparts. Our
42 U.S.C. § 1983 | Civil Rights
New SCOTUS Brief: A Private Lawyer Retained To Represent Government Is Entitled To Claim Qualified Immunity
Today on behalf of the American Bar Association, we filed this amicus brief in Filarsky v. Delia, No. 10-1018 (cert. granted Sep. 27, 2011).
The issue in the case involves the immunities that lawyers may be entitled to claim in civil rights actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. It’s not a land use case…
Is A Private Lawyer Retained To Represent Government Entitled To Claim Qualified Immunity?
Filarsky v. Delia, No. 10-1018 (cert. granted Sep. 27, 2011) is not the typical case for this blog. It’s not a land use case, and involves a question of the immunities that lawyers may be entitled to claim in civil rights actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
But since section 1983 claims and defenses…
Anthony Palazzolo (1918-2011)
From The Day comes the sad news that Anthony Palazzolo, the namesake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Palazzolo v. Rhode Island, 533 U.S. 606 (2001), has died.
Anthony Palazzolo, whose fight to develop his property in Misquamicut made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court, died Nov. 3 at the age of…
Final Cert Briefs In West Linn Case: Are Nollan And Dolan Limited To Exactions Of Land?
We’ve been thinking a lot about exactions lately.
First, it was the petition for certiorari in West Linn Corporate Park LLC v City of West Linn, No. 11-299 (petition for cert. filed Sep. 6, 2011), which asks whether the nexus and “rough proportionality” tests for a regulatory taking in Nollan and Dolan are limited…
Yosemite Seminar Summary – Regulatory Takings: Looking Back And Looking Forward
“Yosemite,” according to California Place Names, Erwin Gudde’s seminal work on the origins of (surprise) California place names, means “they are killers.” It was “[e]vidently a name given to the Indians of the valley by those outside it.”
I raise this historical tidbit because I must admit to feeling a little like “those outside…
Links From “Regulatory Takings: Looking Back And Looking Forward” (Cal. State Bar Yosemite Conference)
Here are the links to the cases and other items discussed today at the session Regulatory Takings – Looking Back and Looking Forward at the Cal State Bar’s Environmental Law Section’s Environmental Law Conference at Yosemite.
These cases are also in your written materials.
…
Amicus Brief In Hawaii SCOTUS Case: Is Hawaiian Homes Property Tax Exemption Racial Discrimination?
The Pacific Legal Foundation, the Cato Institute, Professor Paul M. Sullivan, The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, and the Goldwater Institute have filed this amicus brief, supporting the cert petition filed last month in Corboy v. Louie, No. 11-336 (cert. petition filed Sep. 15, 2011).
That’s the case seeking SCOTUS review of the Hawaii…
CLE Report: Government Ethics, Free Speech, And Voting Rights
As part of the Fall Meeting of the ABA’s Section of State & Local Government Law in Tucson, on Thursday, September 22, I was on a panel discussing the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Carrigan, “Ethical Considerations for Municipal Attorneys: Caught in the Crosshairs Reconciling the Rules of Professional…
Is Eminent Domain A “Civil Rights” Issue?
We recently asked “Is Kelo A Conservative Issue?,” and the the Ricochet blog asked the related question “Is Eminent Domain a Civil Rights Issue?.”
In that vein, check out the above video from Reason about one case where “redevelopment” certainly seems to have raised civil rights concerns.

