Be sure to check out Anthony Alderman (MRICS, SR/WA, CRE, Senior Managing Director at Cushman & Wakefield), who guests on Episode 98 of Clint Schumacher’s Eminent Domain Podcast, “Eminent Domain in Pop Culture.”
You know we are going to really appreciate an episode “about depictions of eminent domain in popular culture – often
Here’s the latest in a controversy we’ve been following.
In 624 Broadway LLC v. Gary Housing Authority, No. 22S-CT-140 (Aug. 29, 2022), the Indiana Supreme Court held that the Authority failed to provide the property owner adequate notice that it would be taking its property as part of a redevelopment project.
The Gary
Every year at this time, it seems, we’re realizing again that as you get older, you forget birthdays. It occurred to us only over this past weekend that that this blog’s “birthday” was looming and we almost let it slip by without notice. It hardly seems like sixteen years ago that we posted here for
The facts are pretty straightforward in the U.S. Court of Appeals’ opinion in Frein v. Pennsylvania State Police, No. 21-1830 (Aug. 30, 2022):
Eric Matthew Frein is on death row for cold-blooded murder. In 2014, he ambushed two Pennsylvania State Troopers, killing one and injuring the other. For a while, he evaded capture. Police
You remember our earlier posts about the issue (known as “home equity theft”). In a series of decisions mostly by state supreme courts, those courts have asked whether it is legal for a state or local government to “keep the change” after seizing and selling a tax debtor’s property. For examples, see these cases:
You remember that case we posted recently, from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in which the court granted summary judgment to a property owner after the city police damaged her home in the course of the police’s apprehension of a suspect. The court rejected the Tenth Circuit’s rationale in a
Here’s the latest in a case and issue we’ve been following. Check out this recently-filed cert petition, involving the federal takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the mortgage crisis in the late ‘aughts. Which allowed them to keep going, but is alleged to have iced out their private shareholders.
The Court
If you understand the headline of this post, congratulations: you are officially so deep in the weeds that you deserve both a Federal Courts and a Takings merit badge.
For those of you not in so deep, here’s the short story behind the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit’s short opinion in Efreom
In Hignell-Stark v. City of New Orleans, No. 21-30643 (Aug. 22, 2022), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, like a lot of other courts, reached an unsurprising conclusion: New Orleans’ restrictions on short-term rental of residential properties isn’t a taking. But there are parts of the opinion that are definitely
We recommend you review the North Carolina Supreme Court’s opinion in Anderson Creek Partners, L.P. v. County of Harnett, No. 63PA21-1 (Aug. 19, 2022). It’s long (70 page majority, plus 19 pages of concurring and dissenting opinions), but worth your time because the majority concludes that legislatively-imposed fees, applicable to all, are “exactions” that