If this isn’t a word … it should be!
If this isn’t a word … it should be!
For the past couple of days, we’ve been in Denver, attending the 2026 Rocky Mountain Land Use Institute at Denver Law School. The program is pretty wide-ranging. Everything from very land-usey topics like state-local delegation, zoning, and takings, and broader subjects like housing policy, western history lessons, and planning strategies. In attendance: private practice lawyers, government lawyers, elected officials, public interest lawyers, legal scholars, planners, and zoning officials. …
Continue Reading Sunny (And Not So Sunny) Days At The 2026 Rocky Mountain Land Use Institute
Check this out, a new cert petition filed yesterday.
As the title of this post notes, this is one of ours. So we won’t be making substantial commentary on it.
But we can say that a sharply-divided Arkansas Supreme Court held that BAS’s Tyler takings claim for the State Lands Commissioner’s failure to return…
In an earlier post, we covered the highlights of 2025.
There are quite a lot to choose from, but here’s our curated list of the year’s lowlights. As in our highlight list, we’re affirmatively omitting cases in which we had a hand.
Here we go:
Cert Denial of the Year: GHP …
It is time to bid farewell to the Year 2025, and our mind wanders back over the last 364 days in an attempt to ascribe meaning, a theme — a vibe — to the year that was.
Scientists tell us that this is just another trip around the Sun, but we humans like to…
But seriously, have a very happy and restful holiday.
– Your friends at inversecondemnation.com

Remember back when we reported on our 100th Anniversary visit to the property in Pittston, Pennsylvania at the center of the seminal regulatory takings case Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon, 260 U.S. 393 (1922)?
What we didn’t note was that the visit motivated us to seek approval for the placement of a roadside marker…

In addition to the Friday speaking panels, on Thursday, October 23, the William and Mary Law School Real Estate Law Society (a student organization) is presenting a “re-argument” of the Supreme Court arguments in Kelo v. New London, in recognition of that case’s twentieth anniversary. Arguing for Susette Kelo will be her lawyer in the real case, the Institute for Justice. The Justices will be property law professors and eminent domain practitioners.
Will the Moot Supreme Court reach a different outcome with the benefit of two decades of experience and hindsight? This event is open to the public, so please join us and find out!
… Continue Reading 2025 Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Speakers
Every year at this time, it seems, we realize once again that as you get older, you overlook birthdays. Time speeds up, or maybe slows down. Very Proustian.
Thus, it occurred to us only yesterday that that this blog’s “birthday” was looming and we almost let it slip by without notice.
It hardly seems…


That’s it. That’s the post.
Feels like a milestone, although we’re not quite sure of what. Well, longevity if nothing else.
Yes, there have been repeat posts. Guest posts. Random missives that are interesting to us, even if they don’t say a whole lot about our usual topics.
But we’ve been doing this…