Here’s the motion for leave and proposed brief amici curiae we filed yesterday in an appeal pending in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
This is a pipeline case (another one!) involving land in Florida. The district court got it right, concluding that the property owner/condemnee was entitled to recover
An observation: courts seem to believe that in eminent domain, a taking, once it is instituted, is inevitable. Thus, the landowner should simply go with the flow, because this is going to happen. We get where that comes from. After all, most takings are completed and the property is acquired. But it isn’t necessarily so. As
As we guessed immediately after arguments, today in this order the Supreme Court has set the Knick v. Township of Scott case for supplemental briefing, and reargument.
Here’s the full text of the order:
This case is restored to the calendar for reargument. The parties and the Solicitor General are directed to file letter
Every year, at the Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference, the conference publishes a law journal with the articles, essays, and remarks presented at last year’s conference. So it was this year, and Volume 7, with the theme of “The Future of Regulatory Takings,” is now available.
We contributed an essay, “Back to the
Pipelines are a hot topic. So much so that we’re devoting a couple of sessions at the upcoming ALI-CLE Eminent Domain and Land Valuation Litigation Conference to the subject (“Where You Haven’t Gone Before: New Approaches to Challenging the Take,” and “Compensation Pitfalls: How to Avoid Problems,” for example).
And, with
Here’s the amici brief filed late last week on behalf of a lot of us (me included, check it out) in the MR-GO case we’ve been following closely ever since it was filed in the Court of Federal Claims.
That court concluded the Corps of Engineers built MR-GO (the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet) shipping channel, essentially
What, you may ask, does the challenge by Hawaii’s counties to the proposed constitutional amendment which was on the ballot (until just a few minutes ago) have to do with the usual topics of this blog?
Not a whole lot (although we do cover property tax and election law issues occasionally), but as always, there’s
Here’s a case about eminent domain and pipelines, but which focuses more on the court’s jurisdiction than on the eminent domain aspects.
In Ameren Transmission Co. of Illinois v. Hutchings, No. 122973 (Oct. 18, 2018), the Illinois Supreme Court held that Illinois circuit courts — that state’s courts of general jurisdiction — do not
Would you pay, say $10 for an undeveloped Maui beachfront parcel that is zoned for hotel and residential purposes, but currently is not developable because the County in the past wanted to condemn the land and turn it into a public park (but then ran out of money)?
In furtherance of its acquisition plan, the
From Reno, Nevada colleague Steve Silva, comes this contribution to our growing collection of Knick/Williamson County-related memes.
Congratulations if you get this without having to do research. If so, you are a True Takings Nerd (and a nerd generally).
For those of you who are not quite getting it, here is