Here’s the Eleventh Circuit’s opinion in a case that adds to a circuit split (CA7 vs others) about whether a private condemnor, exercising the delegated federal power of eminent domain for a pipeline corridor under the Natural Gas Act, can obtain pre-judgment possession of the property, even though the NGA does not delegate the power
CA6 Joins The Growing Circuit Split On Natural Gas Act Immediate Possession Injunctions
As we just detailed, the Eleventh Circuit joined the Third and Fourth (contra the Seventh) Circuits in concluding that a lack of Congressional delegation of quick take power to private pipeline condemnors in the Natural Gas Act does not stand in the way of a federal district court issuing an injunction to affect immediate pre-title
Link’s From Today’s Eminent Domain Conference (Scottsdale)
A very good and active crowd for today’s Eminent Domain Conference (CLE International) in Scottsdale, Arizona. It was good to visit with some old friends, and also to get to meet some new colleagues.
Our talk focused on national trends, and this year’s most interesting condemnation and takings cases. Here’s the links to the cases
Knick’s Supplemental Reply Brief: Injury To Property Triggers Right To Come To Federal Court
Here’s the final brief for Ms. Knick, replying to the Township’s and the Solicitor General’s supplemental letter briefs.
It’s very short, so you should read it yourself. But here’s what we think is the highlight:
Williamson County is irreconcilable with the traditional view that a Takings Clause claim accrues (and is actionable in federal court)
End Of The Term For Law 608: Eminent Domain And Property Rights
With the first snow of the season beginning to fall in Williamsburg, today was the final day of classes at the William and Mary Law School. Which means that my time serving as the inaugural Joseph T. Waldo Visiting Chair in Property Rights Law is beginning to wrap up. There’s still the reading period, exams
Township’s Supplemental Brief In Knick: This Is A Statutory, Not Constitutional, Issue
Here’s the third (and final) supplemental letter brief in Knick v. Township of Scott, No. 17-647 (which is set for reargument before the Supreme Court next month).
Of course, you should not be surprised that the Township disagrees with both Ms. Knick’s arguments, as well as the SG’s supplemental brief, and
SG’s Supplemental Knick Brief: No Fifth Amendment Violation If Govt Does Not Admit To A Taking, But Property Owners Should Still Be Able To Come To Federal Court Anyway To “Vindicate” The Right To Compensation
As we wrote in this post, the federal government”s position in Knick v. Township of Scott, No. 17-647, which is set for reargument next month, has us a bit perplexed.
On one hand, the SG’s bottom line is good: property owners can bring their takings claims against local governments in federal as
Supplemental Knick Brief: Time Of Invasion Is When Property Is “Taken”
Here’s the supplemental letter brief, filed today on behalf of Rose Mary Knick, as requested by the Supreme Court.
Two more — by the Township and by the SG — to be filed today as well. We shall post those as they become available.
Audio: Our Interview With Author Howard Mansfield – “The Habit of Turning The World Upside Down – Our Belief in Property and the Cost of That Belief”
Earlier this week, we spoke to Howard Mansfield, author of the recently-published book “The Habit of Turning the World Upside Down – Our Belief in Property and the Cost of That Belief.”
His book is about property, property rights, and how these ideas are processed by the American psyche. But instead of
Knick Reargument: Wednesday, Jan. 16, 2019
They’re going back, to reargue the case with a full contingent of justices. In the January oral argument calendar published yesterday, the Supreme Court gave us the date and time:
Wednesday, January 16, 2019, at 10:00 a.m.
We will be there, and will bring you our thoughts.