We received a nice (although automatic) email note this morning from SSRN, letting us know that our draft article on Murr v. Wisconsin, Restatement (SCOTUS) of Property: What Happened to Use in Murr v. Wisconsin?, “was recently listed on SSRN’s Top Ten download list for: Property, Land Use & Real Estate Law eJournal.”
Penn Central
Murr v. Wisconsin Sound Bytes From The ABA Annual Meeting Program
A modest but very knowledgeable crowd joined us today at the ABA Annual Meeting in New York for a panel discussion and analysis of Murr v. Wisconsin. Here is the recording of our portion of the presenation (10mb mp3).
Here are links to some of the materials which we and the others…
Even More Murr Programming
As we’ve noted before, Murr v. Wisconsin is proving to be a boon for CLE providers. And law review editors.
Here’s the latest on the programming front, an upcoming webinar from the American Planning Association, “Murr v. Wisconsin: The Supreme Court’s Latest ‘Take’ on Takings,” Monday, August 14, 2017, 1pm Eastern
ABA CLE, NYC: “Murr and Beyond: Implications for Regulatory Takings” – Aug 11, 2017
If you are scheduled to be in or near New York City on Friday, August 11, 2017, please consider attending one or both of the following events:
- 10-11:30am, Midtown Hilton, Concourse E, Concourse level: “Murr and Beyond: Implications for Regulatory Takings.” Yes, Murr is the case that keeps on giving,
…
Restatement (SCOTUS) of Property: What Happened to Use in Murr v. Wisconsin?
A couple of weeks ago, we noted that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Murr v. Wisconsin would no doubt be a boon for law review editors. To avoid shirking our duty, we’ve spent the interim doing some writing, adding a drop to the flood. First draft done, posted on SSRN here.
Emphasis…
ALI-CLE: The Larger Parcel Issue and the Future of Regulatory Takings (July 25, 2017)
One last reminder: next Tuesday, July 25, 2017 at 2:00 pm Eastern, is “The U.S. Supreme Court and Property Rights: The ‘Larger Parcel” Issue and the Future of Regulatory Takings,” ALI-CLE’s first look at the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision on the “larger parcel” or denominator issue in regulatory takings cases where…
Murr Podcast, Episode IV: A New Hope?
Check it out: Clint Schumacher’s latest Eminent Domain Podcast, with guest Professor Ilya Somin on Murr v. Wisconsin.
Conn App: Because Owner Can Easily Correct The Problem With Confiscatory Regulation, His Reasonable Expectations Have Not Been Thwarted
A very short one from the Connecticut Appellate Court, Santos v. Zoning Board of Appeals, No. AC37281 (July 11, 2017) in a Penn Central-style takings challenge to local land use regulations. We’re going to set out the facts, then let you guess who prevailed.
The plaintiff purchased an unimproved parcel of land in Stratford…
2018 ALI-CLE Eminent Domain & Land Valuation Litigation (Charleston, SC) Early-Bird Discount Registration Open
ALI-CLE has posted up the early bird registration page for the 2018 edition of the Eminent Domain and Land Valuation Litigation Conference, to be held January 25-27, 2018 in an exciting new venue, Charleston, South Carolina.
We are putting the agenda and faculty together for the Conference (which, as always, will include the…
Murr Round-Up
Now that the dust has settled somewhat, for your weekend reading, here are your links to some of the vast amount of commentary which the Murr v. Wisconsin decision has thus far generated:
- “Justices Answer Parcel Question in Property-Rights Dispute” – Courthouse News Service
- “Murr – SCOTUS Meets Dick Babcock’s Ghost”
…







