We generally don’t cover unpublished decisions, but since we’re adding this case to our “to watch” list, we’re making an exception. In 62-64 Main Street, LLC v. Mayor and Council of the City of Hackensack, No. A-3257-11T4 (N.J. Super. May 3, 2013), the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court held that “the
9th Circuit: Hard To Complain About Indian Tribe’s Eminent Domain Home Cookin’ When Condemnee Develops Indian Land
There isn’t a whole lot of eminent domain action in the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Grand Canyon Skywalk Development, LLC v. Sa Nyu Wa, Inc., No. 12-15634 (Apr. 26, 2013), and the issue the court analyzes is the relative jurisictions of the federal and tribal courts, but it still is an interesting read
Materials From Today’s Virginia Eminent Domain Conference
For those of you attending the Virginia Eminent Domain Conference, here’s the expanded papers on “Tough Takings Questions: Regulatory Takings, Zoning Issues and Judicial Takings” and Public Use issues.
Use the password provided at the conference to open the pdf’s. It’s the same p/w for both. If you forgot the password, email me.
For those who did not attend, sorry folks, there are some benefits to coming to a conference! Y’all are going to have to wait for a bit — after a decent interval to allow the attendees to get their money’s worth, we’ll remove the password.
For more about the cases and books we discussed yesterday during my presentation on “Virginia’s Place in National Eminent Domain Trends, check these out:
- Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff, 467 U.S. 229 (1984) (private takings, Public Use Clause).
- Lingle v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc., 544 U.S. 528 (2005) (gas station rent control, and the demise of the “substantially advance” test as a takings test).
- Kaiser Aetna v. United States, 444 U.S. 164 (1979) (navigable waters, regulatory takings).
- Livingston v. Virginia Dep’t of Transportation, 726 S.E.2d 264 (Va. 2012) (flooding and taking liability).
- James Ely, The Guardian of Every Other Right: A Constitutional History of Property Rights (1998) (read this book!).
Continue Reading Materials From Today’s Virginia Eminent Domain Conference
Fla Fed Ct: Exaction Scheme Is “Constitutional Mischief” To Avoid “Nettlesome Payment of ‘Just Compensation'”
Here’s one to brighten your day, courtesy of the the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Flordia (that’s Tampa, to all you non-Floridians). In Hillcrest Property, LLP v. Pasco County, No. 8:10-cv-819-T-23TBM (Apr. 12, 2013), the court held the county’s “Right of Way Preservation Ordinance” that allows it to land
Sorry, Property Owners. Supreme Court Just Not That Into You
When the cert petition was filed in Ilagan v. Ungacta, No. 12-723 (cert. petition filed Dec. 7, 2012), we wrote that the case seemed like a good vehicle for the U.S. Supreme Court to revisit the pretext-in-eminent-domain issue it teased us with in Kelo, especially the part about the taking being part of
Indiana S Ct: Meaning Of “De Novo” Rehearing In Eminent Domain Code Not Quite A “No Brainer”
Check out the opinion of the Indiana Supreme Court in Utility Center, Inc. v. City of Fort Wayne, No. 90S04-1208-PL-450 (Apr. 11, 2013. The issue is what the term “rehear … de novo” means in Indiana’s eminent domain code relating to condemnations by cities and towns, which provides for such review by trial courts
Texas: Which Judgment Rules In An Inverse Case?
Here’s a quick one from the Texas Supreme Court. Texas, Dep’t of Transportation v. A.P.I. Pipe and Supply, LLC , No. 10-1020 (Apr. 5, 2013) is an inverse condemnationut the issue isn’t really one of inverse condemnation, but who owns the property. If the City of Edinburg does, then TxDOT didn’t inversely condemn API’s
Ebert On “The Castle”
Film critic Roger Ebert, whose death was announced yesterday, was a huge fan of our favorite eminent domain movie, Australia’s The Castle. Not so much a fan in the four-star-auteur-director-Fellini-Malick-Herzog mode, but a fan in the sense that when it came time for programming for his personal film festival and others, he selected it
2013 Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Prize: Professor Thomas Merrill
William & Mary Law School, host of the annual Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference, has announced that Columbia Law School Professor Thomas W. Merrill will receive the 2013 B-K Prize at the conference (October 17-18, 2013, Williamsburg, Virginia). The photo above is of the plaque on the wall at the William & Mary Law School
Wednesday Round-Up: Houseboat Redux, Backtracking Post-Kelo, Arkansas Game Remand, Big Gulps
Here’s what’s on our reading list today:
- Here’s the latest chapter in the saga of one Fane Lozman, whose titling at windmills got some Supreme Court love recently when the Court held that his floating home was not a “vessel” under admiralty law, and a Florida city was wrong to seize it. My Damon