In all of today’s excitement about the Court’s opinions in Horne v. Dep’t of Agriculture, No. 14-275, the “raisin takings” case which we posted about earlier, we almost lost sight of the other property rights decision issued by the Court, City of Los Angeles v. Patel, No.13-1175 (June 22, 2015).
The case did
Remember that case we posted on a few months ago, where the Texas Supreme Court was asked to review the issue of whether trial courts have jurisdiction to supervise eminent domain cases which are in the “administrative” phase and not yet in the “judicial” phase (City of Dallas v. Highway 205 Farms, Ltd
In Town of Matthews v. Wright, No. COA14-943 (Apr. 21, 2015), the North Carolina Court of Appeals invalidated a taking, the stated purpose of which was to make a portion of a private road into a public street.
A taking to open a private road to the public? That sure does sound like a
Earlier, we posted the cert petition in Hillcrest Property, LLP v. Pasco County, No. 12-846 (cert. petition filed Jan. 15, 2015), which asks the Supreme Court to review the Eleventh Circuit’s decision throwing out Hillcrest’s facial substantive due process challenge to the county’s “Right of Way Preservation Ordinance.” The ordinance allows the county to land
Frequent readers know that we just love the Australian comedy film “The Castle,” which tells the tale of one man’s legal fight to save his family’s home from the abusive exercise of eminent domain power. (See “Kelo Down Under,” our review.) The case is played for laughs and in the
Check out State ex rel. Sunset Estate Properties, LLC v. Village of Lodi, No. 2013-1856 (Mar. 10, 2015), a case in which the Ohio Supreme Court held that a local zoning ordinance was unconstitutional on its face.
The Village’s zoning code, adopted in 1987, banned manufactured home (trailer) parks. Of course, the ordinance could
Here’s the amici brief of the National Association of Home Builders, the National Association of Realtors, the National Association of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center, and others in the case we’ve been following out of the federal courts in Florida about a county’s “right of way preservation” ordinance (which is somewhat similar, but perhaps
Here’s the trial court’s opinion in one of the Jersey Shore “dune replenishment” cases we’ve been following.
These are the cases in which owners of beachfront property (or in one case, a municipality itself) objected to the state and local governments summarily taking easements on private property to be used to armor the shoreline
Yesterday, we were able to attend the Ninth Circuit oral arguments in a case which we posted on last month, Rancho de Calistoga v. City of Calistoga, No. 12-17749.
In that case, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed the complaint filed by the owner of a wine country
Land users, please read the California Court of Appeal’s opinion in Woody’s Group, Inc. v. City of Newport Beach, No.G050155 (Jan. 29, 2015), which starts off with this straightforward summary:
The language of the law is replete with synonyms for fairness: due process, equal protection, good faith, harmless error are all ways of expressing