At the recent ALI-CLE Eminent Domain and Land Valuation Litigation Conference in Nashville, our colleagues, New York’s Jon Houghton and Hawaii’s Dave Day presented a very informative program on litigating regulatory takings cases. Jon is a property owner-side lawyer, while Dave is a Deputy Attorney General who represents the State of Hawaii in such
Robert H. Thomas
Upcoming Arguments In Maryland Takings Case – 10am ET, Tuesday, March 10, 2020
Here’s the latest in a case we’ve been following.
No. 52 Maryland Reclamation Associates, Inc. v. Harford County, Maryland
Issues – Constitutional Law – 1) Does a takings claim under the Maryland Constitution accrue at the time of a stayed administrative decision or at the time of a final judicial decision affirming that result? 2)…
New Cert Petition: Are Patents “Property” Protected By The Takings Clause (Is Inter Partes Review A Taking)?
You recall that a short while ago, in Oil States Energy Servs., LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, 138 S. Ct. 1365 (2018), the Supreme Court held that patents are a form of “public property” (more like a government-created entitlement), and thus Congress can withhold the usual Article III tribunal and a jury when…
Cases And Materials From Today’s WM Law ACS Talk: “Pipelines at the Intersection of Environmental, Administrative, and Property Law: How Divergent Interests Joined Forces To Challenge Big Energy”
We just completed a fun hour-long talk with the students in the William and Mary Law School’s American Constitution Society, the Native American Law Society, and the Society on Environmental and Animal Law about the various pipeline cases that are ongoing nationwide. (If our tech worked, we shall post the audio recording in a future…
William & Mary Spring Course: “No Property in Man” – Slavery And Property Rights
Update: here’s a report (video included!) about our spring “field trip” to what arguably is the birthplace of a “more perfect union” (which just happens to be right down the road from William and Mary Law School).
********
This semester, we’re teaching a short course at William and Mary Law School (and yes, thanks to…
Latest Ep. Eminent Domain Podcast: Carousel Farms Cert Petition, William & Mary Law
Here’s the latest episode of Clint Schumacher’s Eminent Domain Podcast. Featuring an interview with the Institute for Justice’s Robert McNamara about an eminent domain case we’ve been following, Woodcrest Homes, Inc. v. Carousel Farms Metro. Dist., No. 19-607 (cert. petition filed Nov. 7, 2019). Also included, a short talk with Delia Root…
Sixth Circuit Reminds Us That Rooker-Feldman Does Not Limit Judicial Takings Cases
After the recent demise of Williamson County‘s state procedures requirement, we’ve been looking at other ways in which takings claims raised in federal courts may be challenged. You know, things like the Eleventh Amendment, the still-valid final decision rule, full faith and credit and res judicata, and our old favorite obscure…
Substantial Loss Of Access — Even If Not Total — Is A Taking
The local government does stuff that local governments do. Things like improve nearby roads. In doing so, they often interfere with the ingress and egress that nearby landowners enjoy.
In Clark v. City of Pembroke Pines, No. 4D18-3549 (Feb. 26, 2020), the city had many reasons for erecting concrete barriers (among them the closure…
Mass: No Takings Claim For Flooding Because Owner Let It Happen For A Long Time
A super short one (a hair over 4 pages) from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
In Gentili v. Town of Sturbridge, No. SJC-12810 (Feb. 24, 2020), the court made short work of a property owner’s claim that an earlier Land Court verdict concluding that the town had obtained a prescriptive easement to discharge storm…
Carousing at Carousel Farms: Final SCOTUS Cert-Stage Briefs In Colorado Eminent Domain Abuse Case
The last two cert-stage briefs have been filed in a case we’ve been following for a while (since it was decided by the Colorado Court of Appeals).
In Carousel Farms Metro. Dist. v. Woodcrest Homes, Inc., 444 P.3d 802 (Colo. App. 2017), the appeals court invalidated an attempt to exercise eminent domain to…





