Unboxing Video: Horne v. Dep’t of Agriculture
We are distracted today so haven’t had the time to write up our initial thoughts about Horne v. Dep’t of Agriculture, No. 14-275 (June 22, 2015), the California raisins takings case which the Supreme Court decided yesterday.
So instead we did this video, a take off on those goofy tech “unboxing” videos.…
Kelo At 10: Still Stinks, And A Decade Has Not Lessened The Odor
In case you somehow missed it, takings junkies, today, June 23, 2015, is the tenth anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court’s excreable 5-4 decision in Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), and just about anyone who is anyone in our field has weighed in with a retrospective. We don’t have much…
Today’s Other Supreme Court Property Rights Decision
In all of today’s excitement about the Court’s opinions in Horne v. Dep’t of Agriculture, No. 14-275, the “raisin takings” case which we posted about earlier, we almost lost sight of the other property rights decision issued by the Court, City of Los Angeles v. Patel, No.13-1175 (June 22, 2015).
The case did…
Easy Cases Made Hard: Horne v. USDA And California Raisins (And Affordable Housing)
Any time the Supreme Court rules for a property owner in a takings case, you’ve got reason to celebrate.
They didn’t pay the fine, g8vt didn’t take grab their raisins. Case over
So whats next? Does the dept have to write a check to the Hornes for $xxxx? Well, no, they csnt get that relief…
Here’s Why The Supreme Court Held The Raisin Marketing Order Was Unconstitutional…
… look no further than the above report from The Daily Show.
Yeah, it’s satire and does at times make light of a serious case, but the USDA was trying to defend a regulation that…
Raisin Round-Up
Update: here’s more Horne talk, in addition to our own initial thoughts in the above video and this post (“Magna Raisins: 8-1 SCOTUS Says There’s A Taking, But Not All Agree On Remedy“):
- “Today’s Other Supreme Court Property Rights Decision” (our post about City of Los Angeles v. Patel, No.
…
Podcast: Leviathan Shrugged? The Supreme Court’s Raisin Takings Case
Here’s the podcast of our recent talk to the American Bar Association’s Section of State and Local Government Law about the (then) upcoming decision in Horne v. Dep’t of Agriculture, No. 14-275. Transcript here, if you’d prefer to read it.
This is a preview of the decision. But since we made some predictions…
Magna Raisins: 8-1 SCOTUS Says There’s A Taking, But Not All Agree On Remedy
As we predicted, the Supreme Court today held that personal property — here, raisins — is property protected from uncompensated acquisition, and that the USDA’s New Deal regulations pursuant to which the Department fined the Hornes for not turning over to the government a massive percentage of their yearly crop without compensation, is a…
HAWSCT Clarifies What Qualifies As An Appealable Agency Action Under The Administrative Procedures Act
Here’s one that isn’t about land use, but should be of interest to Hawaii land users, since so much of what we do is tied up in the Administrative Procedures Act.
Hawaii’s APA can be a trap for the unwary: if you run to court to challenge what you believe is the agency’s appealable action, you…
