Mississippi, like many states, by statute allows private parties to condemn a neighbor’s land for use as a private access road, if doing so is “necessary” for a landlocked parcel to gain ingress and egress. This power is subject to limitations: for example, the parcel must be truly landlocked with no other access. Mississippi apparently has
Guest Post: Bragg – Wrong Question, Wrong Result In Texas, To The Detriment Of Sustainable Water Supply
Today’s post is by colleague William Wade, an economist in Nashville, Tennessee, who has thought a lot — and written extensively — about the just compensation and damages available in inverse condemnation and regulatory takings cases.
He provides his thoughts on a recent trial court decision in a closely-watched Texas water case, in which the
Eminent Domain, Inverse Condemnation, And Texas Barbecue: Selling Property To Transit Authority Precluded Later Inverse Condemnation Claim For Lost Profits
The photo above has pretty much nothing to do with today’s case, except it also involves a Texas barbecue joint. More on the photo after a short review of the Texas Court of Appeals’ decision in Lenox Barbeque and Catering, Inc. v. Metro. Transit Authority of Harris Cnty., No. 14-14-00383-CV (Feb. 23, 2016).
Appraiser Is “Independent” Even Where One Side Is Paying Him
One from the California Court of Appeal that may be interesting even though it is about municipal law, and not eminent domain or takings.
We present to you San Diegans for Open Gov’t v. City of San Diego, No. D067578 (Mar. 3, 2016, published Mar. 16, 2016), because the court concluded that an appraiser
No Property Rights Intel On The New SCOTUS Nominee
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit doesn’t handle too many takings, eminent domain, or property rights related cases. But after today’s announcement that the Chief Judge of the Circuit was nominated for the vacant spot on the U.S. Supreme Court, we did a search through the legal databases anyhow, just in case
Reverse NIMBY? Allowing Horse Boarding Facility To Close Isn’t An “Environmental” Issue
We usually don’t cover decisions under California’s Environmental Quality Act. You could spend your entire legal career doing these kind of cases, and there are other forums which ably follow CEQA.
But we had to make a mention of the California Court of Appeal’s recent opinion in Preserve Poway v. City of Poway
8th Circuit: Medicare Reimbursement Cap Isn’t A Taking
No real surprise here: in Southeast Arkansas Hospice, Inc. v. Burwell, No. 15-1946 (Mar. 10, 2016), the U.S. Court of Appeals held that the statutory cap on Medicare reimbursements for hospice care isn’t a taking of the excess over a facility’s actual costs, because the facility voluntarily opted-in to the program:
SEARK has not
Another Takings Pilgrimage (Unconstitutional Conditions Technically, But Close Enough)
|
The Nollans own a beachfront lot in Ventura County, California. A quarter-mile north of their property is Faria County Park, an oceanside public park with a public beach and recreation area. Another public beach area, known locally as “the Cove,” lies 1,800 feet south of their lot. A concrete seawall approximately eight feet high separates |
Today’s Must Read: “The Accidental Abstention Doctrine: After Thirty Years, the Case for Diverting Federal Takings Claims to State Court Under Williamson County Has Yet to Be Made”
Read this: “The Accidental Abstention Doctrine: After Thirty Years, the Case for Diverting Federal Takings Claims to State Court Under Williamson County Has Yet to Be Made,” by R.S. Radford and Jennifer Fry Thompson, published in the most recent edition of the Baylor Law Review.
If the title weren’t enough to
Emergency Demolition Of Damaged Building Not A Taking
The roof collapsed and damaged the building. In the view of the City, that created an immediate danger so it demolished it. But the building owners had plans to fix it up, and claimed the demolition was a taking. Trial court said no, the Connecticut Appellate Court affirmed:
On the basis of our review