A short one from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. In Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC v. 18.27 Acres, No. 19-10705 (Aug. 3, 2020) (unpub.), the court concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it allowed the property owner to testify about the value of his property.
This
This week brought the sad news that our friend, mentor, and property-rights spiritual godfather, R. Charles Bocken, has moved on to that great plot of land in the sky.
A man of seemingly infinite talents and biography (WWII B-24 crewman, Chief Judge Advocate for the Pacific Air Forces, SCOTUS litigator (and winner, more on
Check this out, a new podcast for your dirt lawyer types to follow, Pendulum Podcast. As it describes itself:
An informative and sometimes irreverent podcast for those interested in eminent domain, right of way land acquisition, or infrastructure development. Topics for discussion frequently include condemnation of real property for public use, just compensation, the
Here’s the latest in a case we posted about last year. There, the North Dakota Supreme Court noted an open issue, but declined to resolve it. Now, in Fargo v. Wieland, No. 20200100 (July 22, 2020), the court addressed it head-on.
Here’s how the noted the issue:
whether a landowner who appeals an
Here’s the latest in a case we posted about last year. There, the North Dakota Supreme Court noted an open issue, but declined to resolve it. Now, in Fargo v. Wieland, No. 20200100 (July 22, 2020), the court addressed it head-on.
Here’s how the noted the issue:
whether a landowner who appeals an
Today’s case, Hardy v. Sidoti, [2020] NSWSC 1057 (Aug. 12, 2020) is — like yesterday’s — from a foreign jurisdiction, but this one (unlike yesterday’s) is not an eminent domain case. It’s just plain old property law. Adverse possession to be precise.
But because the court’s official summary puts it this way, we could
We can’t pretend that we understand everything that is going on in the Supreme Court of India’s recent opinion in Hari Krishna Mandir Trust v. State of Maharashtra, No. 2013-6156 (Aug. 7, 2020) (but when has that ever stopped us before?), but after reviewing the decision, we thought we would post it because of
Check this out, a newly-published article on takings by two eminent Florida takings practitioners, Alicia Gonzalez & Susan L. Trevarthen, Deciding Where to Take Your Takings Case Post-Knick, 49 Stetson L. Rev. 539 (2020).
If the title isn’t enough to grab your interest, here’s the description in the Introduction,
Post-Knick,both plaintiffs
Here’s the Virginia Supreme Court’s order (over vociferous dissents) extending a ban on state courts issuing writs of eviction and processing unlawful detainer (eviction) proceedings:
“Effective August 10,2020, and through September 7,2020, pursuant to Va. Code § 17.1-330, the issuance of writs of eviction pursuant to unlawful detainer actions is suspended and continued. However, this
Registration is up and online. Join us (online) for the 2020 Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference. Tuition: free, unless you want CLE credit (in which case it is a very modest $100). Because this conference has gone virtual, the usual Wren Building awards banquet to honor this year’s B-K Prize winner, lawprof Henry Smith
