Missed our law firm colleagues Jeff McCoy, Damien Schiff, and Christina Martin when they were live, talking about their SCOTUS wins in Wilkins v. United States (is the statute of limitations in federal Quiet Title Act cases a jurisdictional bar?), Sackett v. E.P.A. (scope of Clean Water Act wetlands jurisdiction), and Tyler v. Hennepin County
Has Not Aged Well – SCOTUS, June 11, 1923: “The necessity for appropriating private property for public use is not a judicial question.”
Continuing in our line of posts noting milestones in dirt law, we bring you Rindge Co. v. County of Los Angeles, 262 U.S. 700 (1923), decided 100 years ago today.
For any of you who have driven the Pacific Coast Highway through Malibu, you will know the site of this eminent domain
Upcoming Event: “The History [That Doesn’t Suck] of Eminent Domain” (Wed, June 7, 5pm ET – Free!)
Mark your calendars to join us on Wednesday, June 7, 2023 at 5pm Eastern Time, as the Eminent & Right of Way Club welcomes Professor Greg Jackson, host of the History That Doesn’t Suck Podcast.
We’re going to have a discussion about the history of eminent domain, what zoning looked like in
New Takings Cert Petition (Ours): Can Govt Thwart Federal Court Regulatory Takings Claims By Seeking Abstention In Favor Of State Courts?
Here’s the latest in a case we’ve been following since before it became one of ours.
In Gearing v. City of Half Moon Bay, No. 21-16688 (Dec. 8, 2022), the Ninth Circuit upheld the district court’s dismissal of a regulatory takings case, holding that federal courts should abstain from considering regulatory takings cases in
Tyler Takings Round-Up
Here are what others are saying about Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Tyler v. Hennepin County, No. 22-166 (U.S. May 25, 2023), the case in which the Court unanimously held that the county’s keeping the excess equity in Ms. Tyler’s home over what she owed in property taxes and fees is an uncompensated taking
Unanimous SCOTUS: “state law cannot be the only source” Of Property Rights, And “traditional property law principles” As Enforced By The Takings Clause Play A Role
We’ll be rendering unto Caesar, but first we must
decide: classic or creamy?
That was quick: it seems like it was only yesterday — or maybe more accurately, less than a month ago — that we were listening in live to the Supreme Court as it heard arguments in Tyler v. Hennepin County, No.
Mass SJC: Big Dig Can’t Squeeze New Easement Into An Old One: Easements Taken By Eminent Domain Are Interpreted Like Every Other Easement
Check out this one from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Smiley First, LLC v. Dep’t of Transportation, No. SJC-13300 (May 23, 2023). [But first, a disclosure: our law firm filed this amicus brief in support of the property owner.]
Now that that is out of the way, here’s the case.
Back in 1991, MassDOT’s
Iowa Trial Court: Pipeline Precondemnation Entry Statute Is Facially Unconstitutional
When a court’s opinion (even a trial court’s opinion) starts out with the epigram, “‘Freedom and property rights are inseparable, you cannot have one without the other.’- George Washington,” you know you are in for a ride.
So begins the opinion of the Clay County, Iowa District Court in Navigator Heartland, LLC v.
Condemnation 101: Preparing & Presenting an Eminent Domain Case Webcast (May 18, 2023)
Missed out on the 2023 ALI-CLE Eminent Domain and Land Valuation Litigation Conference back in February in Austin, and the legendary “Condemnation 101” track?
Well, here’s your chance to get the knowledge. On May 18, 2023, ALI-CLE is going live with a rebroadcast of that program, including real-time Q & A
SCOTUS GVR’s Pipeline Cert Petition On Delegation Of Eminent Domain To Private Parties
In this Order, the Supreme Court granted this cert petition which presents these questions:
Whether a facial challenge to Congress’s delegation of eminent domain power to private parties is properly filed in district court, as this Court held in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey, 141 S. Ct. 2244 (2021), or with FERC