It’s been our experience that when a court of appeals — particularly when it’s the Ninth Circuit, and it’s the eve of oral argument — raises an issue on its own after the briefs have been filed and requests supplemental briefing, then whatever that issue is must really be on the judges’ minds. They’re the cream
42 U.S.C. § 1983 | Civil Rights
Guest Post: Upcoming Ninth Circuit Oral Argument In Bridge Aina Lea: Pullman Abstention, Williamson County Ripeness, And Absolute Immunity
Before we get to today’s post (kindly provided by our colleague and friend Paul Schwind), and the Ninth Circuit briefs, here’s some background on the cases he writes about.
On June 10, 2014, the Ninth Circuit will ride circuit to Honolulu and hear oral arguments in a case which we’ve posted about before. The litigation is…
2d Cir and Catch-22: Takings Case Ripe, “Seeking a final decision from the Town would be futile”
Update: PLF’s Dave Breemer on the decision “In a New Victory, Court Blasts Rules Barring Court Access for Property Owners,” while Gideon Kanner adds his thoughts in “Be Still, My Heart! Second Circuit Rules for a Property Owner In a Stinging Inverse Condemnation Opinion.”
————————————
Check this out, just received: In…
New Article Of Note: The Rebirth of Federal Takings Review? The Courts’ ‘Prudential’ Answer to Williamson County’s Flawed State Litigation Ripeness Requirement
Back in October, we had the honor of moderating a discussion about the ripeness issue in takings law at the 40th Anniversary Symposium on The Takings Issue at Touro Law School (see here and here for more). Professor Vicki Been and Pacific Legal Foundation’s J. David Breemer were the panelists, each weighing in on how…
4th Cir: Uniform Relocation Act Requirements Are Like The Pirate’s Code – “More What You’d Call ‘Guidelines,’ Than Actual Rules”
One portion of the federal Uniform Relocation Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4651, requires Federal agencies participating in projects requiring the acquisition of private property to be guided by certain policies that “assure consistent treatment for owners . . . and . . . .promote public confidence in Federal land acquisition practices,” such as (and we’re paraphrasing…
Tuesday Round-Up: Hawaii In The Eminent Domain Spotlight
Looks like eminent domain and Hawaii are in the news today. Here’s what we’re reading:
- In “Scalia the Prophet?” Gideon Kanner comments about Justice Scalia’s recent appearance at one of our almas mater, the University of Hawaii law school. Scalia says that Kelo will eventually be overruled (“it will not survive”).
- Lawprof Ilya
…
New Cert Petition: State Court Altering Bottle Refund Rights A Judicial Taking
Here’s the latest foray into the judicial takings arena. In this cert petition, a beverage distributor asserts that the Connecticut Supreme Court’s decision altering established property rights in unclaimed refund values in bottles resulted in a taking.
Here are the Questions Presented:
For nearly 30 years, Connecticut beverage distributors had established property rights in socalled…
En Banc 9th Cir: LA Ordinance Allowing Inspection Of Hotel Records Facially Invalid
Check this out. In Patel v. City of Los Angeles, No. 08-56567 (Dec. 24, 2013), the en banc Ninth Circuit concluded that a city ordinance which requires hotel owners to open guest records for inspection to the LAPD without a warrant constitutes a “search,” and that doing so is a facial violation of the…
New Cert Petition: How Do You Enforce The Full Faith And Credit Clause (And What Is A Judicial Taking)?
Civil pro wonks, get ready: we all know that under the Full Faith and Credit Clause, states are required to give the judgments of another state the same respect that those judgments would receive in the courts of the other state. That principle remains the same whether the judgment is issued by a state…
Hawaii Dem Party In Open Primary Challenge: Hawaii Citizens “Think One Way,” So Don’t Reward Incompetent Parties By Violating Our Associational Rights
Here’s the latest brief in the Democratic Party’s federal court challenge to Hawaii’s “open primary” system (the Party’s reply brief, which both is its final word supporting its motion for summary judgment, and its response to the State of Hawaii’s counter-motion for summary judgment).
This brief responds to the State’s argument that…
