Here’s the cert petition in a case we’ve been following that presents a question that has divided the lower courts – do the nexus and rough proportionality tests for whether a land use exaction works a taking apply to exactions of cash, or are they limited to land exactions? In St. Johns River Water Management
2012
Virginia: Single Instance Of Flooding Can Support Inverse Condemnation Claim
A one-time flood can result in government liability for inverse condemnation. That’s the holding of the Virginia Supreme Court in Livingston v. Virginia Dep’t of Transportation, No. 101006 (Va. June 7, 2012), in which the court reversed the trial court demurrer (dismissal of the case for failure to state a claim).
The plaintiffs claim…
More Thoughts On Honolulu Rail And The Sufficiency Of Archaeological Review
Last week, we were on the Rick Hamada program on KHVH-AM, summing up the recent Hawaii Supreme Court oral arguments in Kaleikini v. Yoshioka, No. SCAP-11-0000611, the appeal asking whether archaeological review must be completed for the entire 20-mile length of the Honolulu rail project, or whether it can be done on a “phased”…
Petition Arguing That Distinguishing Williamson County Results In An “Unfair Procedural Trap For Condemning Authorities Is “Petition Of The Day”
SCOTUSblog has picked the cert petition in Redevelopment Authority of the County of Montgomery, Pennsylvania v. R & J Holding Co.as its “Petition of the Day” —
Issue(s): (1) Whether issue preclusion bars a takings claim based on the Fifth Amendment only where the state court expressly decides Fifth Amendment issues or…
Final Brief In Case Challenging Hawaiian Homes Property Tax Exemption As Racial Discrimination: SG’s Assertion That HAWSCT Decision Was One Of State Law “Dead Wrong.”
Here is the final brief (Petitioner’s response to the SG’s inviation amicus) in Corboy v. Louie, No. 11-336 (cert. petition filed Sep. 15, 2011), the case asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review the Hawaii Supreme Court’s dismissal of a challenge to the property tax exemptions conferred on lessees of Hawaiian Homesteads. The…
More On SCOTUS’s Property Tax (In)equality Case
Here’s more on Armour v. City of Indianapolis, No. 11-161 (June 4, 2012), the case in which a 6-3 majority of the Supreme Court held that the City’s decision to forgive the balance owing for homeowners who had not fully paid the sewer assessement, while not issuing refunds to their neighbors who had already…
9th Circuit: Hawaii’s Regulation Of Commercial Beach Weddings Does Not Violate First Amendment, Except…
This just in: the Ninth Circuit has issued an opinion in Kaahumanu v. State of Hawaii Dep’t of Land and Natural Resources, No. 10-15645 (June 6, 2012), the case challenging the State’s regulation of commercial weddings on state beaches under the First Amendment. The court mostly upheld the regulations, but struck down the…
HAWSCT Oral Arguments: The Next Big Hawaii Water Case
Watch this case: it is likely to be a landmark in Hawaii water law.
Hawaii water law cases tend to be vast adventures in history, culture, irreconcilable arguments, and oddball doctrines (e.g., appurtenant water rights are keyed to the amount of taro under cultivation at the time of the 1848 Mahele), and the…
SCOTUS: Property Owners Who Paid Sewer Assessements In Full Are Fools
That’s the essence of today’s opinion in Armour v. City of Indianapolis, No. 11-161 (June 4, 2012), in which a 6-3 majority upheld the City’s decision to forgive the balance owing for homeowners who had not fully paid the assessement, while not issuing refunds to their neighbors who had already paid in full.
The…
Does Appellate Oral Argument Matter? You Bet
It’s a frequent question: does appellate oral argument really matter?
We’ve always harbored the belief that it does in some cases, and if you have any doubts, look no further than today’s Ninth Circuit opinion in Nordyke v. King, No. 07-15763 (June 1, 2012), where the en banc court essentially concluded that the…
