Update: here’s a report (video included!) about our spring “field trip” to what arguably is the birthplace of a “more perfect union” (which just happens to be right down the road from William and Mary Law School).
********
This semester, we’re teaching a short course at William and Mary Law School (and yes, thanks to
Here’s the latest episode of Clint Schumacher’s Eminent Domain Podcast. Featuring an interview with the Institute for Justice’s Robert McNamara about an eminent domain case we’ve been following, Woodcrest Homes, Inc. v. Carousel Farms Metro. Dist., No. 19-607 (cert. petition filed Nov. 7, 2019). Also included, a short talk with Delia Root
After the recent demise of Williamson County‘s state procedures requirement, we’ve been looking at other ways in which takings claims raised in federal courts may be challenged. You know, things like the Eleventh Amendment, the still-valid final decision rule, full faith and credit and res judicata, and our old favorite obscure
The local government does stuff that local governments do. Things like improve nearby roads. In doing so, they often interfere with the ingress and egress that nearby landowners enjoy.
In Clark v. City of Pembroke Pines, No. 4D18-3549 (Feb. 26, 2020), the city had many reasons for erecting concrete barriers (among them the closure
A super short one (a hair over 4 pages) from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
In Gentili v. Town of Sturbridge, No. SJC-12810 (Feb. 24, 2020), the court made short work of a property owner’s claim that an earlier Land Court verdict concluding that the town had obtained a prescriptive easement to discharge storm
The last two cert-stage briefs have been filed in a case we’ve been following for a while (since it was decided by the Colorado Court of Appeals).
In Carousel Farms Metro. Dist. v. Woodcrest Homes, Inc., 444 P.3d 802 (Colo. App. 2017), the appeals court invalidated an attempt to exercise eminent domain to
Where is this? The clues are all in the picture.
You’ve seen the citation so many times, your eyes probably gloss over it. After all, Westlaw lists it with 4,507 “Citing References.” That’s a heckuva lot of citations to a single case.
Like this one, pulled from a recent random federal district court opinion:
And
We were all set to take a deeper dive into the Court of Federal Claims’s recent opinion in the “downstream” Harvey flooding cases (we could not do so at the time the opinion was issued last week because we were tied up doing real lawyer stuff), when our Reno, Nevada colleague Steve Silva (who most
They’re coming so fast, we can hardly keep up.
Today, in Castillo v. United States, No. 19-1158 (Feb. 20, 2020), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit resolved a common issue in rails-to-trails takings cases: when a property owner holds title and her deed describes the land as bordering on a
Check out the latest (and final) episode of the Institute for Justice’s “Bound by Oath” podcast. IJ’s John K. Ross was kind enough to ask us to be a guest on the show titled “Excessive Fines,” and our friend and colleague Bob McNamara and I sat down in Nashville to record our
