A short, but published, opinion from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
In Archbold-Garrett v. New Orleans, No. 17-30692 (June 22, 2018), the court held that the plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment, Fifth Amendment, and Fourteenth Amendment claims (search and seizure, compensation, and procedural due process) were ripe for federal court, even though
In Adams Outdoor Advertising, LP v. City of Madison, No. 2016AP537 (June 19, 2018), the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that the City’s construction of a bridge next to — but not on — property on which Adams maintained a non-conforming billboard, was not a taking.
There didn’t seem to be much of a dispute
Here’s a new cert petition, filed yesterday in a case we’ve been following out of Louisiana that asks the Supreme Court to revisit the Public Use Clause questions left open by Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005).
In Violet Dock Port, LLC v. St. Bernard Port, Harbor, & Terminal
A quick check of the Supreme Court’s docket in the Knick v. Township of Scott case shows that no less than 18 amici briefs have been filed top side. Not all of them in support of the Petitioner mind you (two, the briefs of the United States and of the American Planning Association, are in
It’s a go for next Monday, June, 11, 2018, and the exclusive Honolulu screening of “Little Pink House,” the feature film about the Kelo v. City of New London case.
There are still some seats left, so if you are even thinking of attending, buy your ticket here, right now.
We’ve seen
The main point we’re trying to make in the amici brief we are filing today on behalf of Citizens’ Alliance for Property Rights Legal Fund in Knick v. Township of Scott, No. 17-647 (cert. granted Mar. 5, 2018), is that the average property owner simply cannot fathom why—if a state or local government has taken
Here’s the Petitioner’s Brief on the Merits in Knick v. Township of Scott, No. 17-647, the case in which the Supreme Court is being asked to revisit our old nemesis, Williamson County‘s “state exhaustion” requirement, a doctrine which tells takings plaintiffs that they cannot press a takings claim against state or local governments
Recently, Pennsylvania property owners filed two cert petitions (download here and here) asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review this question:
Whether the Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Safety Act (HLPSA)1 preempts the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission’s (PUC) jurisdiction to issue Certificates of Public Convenience resulting in eminent domain power when the HLPSA states it
Here’s the latest in the Houston flood cases against the federal government asserting inverse condemnation, which we’ve been following.
In this Opinion and Order, the Court of Federal Claims (Judge Lettow) rejected the Government’s motion to dismiss, deferring it until trial. If you want a quick rundown of the case, the
Jeff Benedict, author of “Little Pink House,” the book about the Kelo v. New London eminent domain debacle (and now a movie) has made a video (at the still-vacant Fort Trumbull site), and written an op-ed, arguing that the land should be conveyed back to its former owners, including Ms. Kelo: