As you know, yesterday the Supreme Court granted cert in Horne v. U.S.D.A., No. 12-123 (cert. granted Nov. 20, 2012), the third takings claim this season. As this article asked, what, if anything, is going on? Is it just “serendipity” or a “return to the norm” as two lawprofs quoted in the article
Nollan/Dolan | Exactions
Professor Ely, You Magnificent Bastard, I Read Your Book!
Here are my remarks from last week’s Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference at the William & Mary Law School in Williamsburg, Virginia. Our panel spoke on “Property Rights in Times of Economic Crisis,” and included lawprofs James W. Ely (Vanderbilt), William Fischel, (Dartmouth), and Eric Kades (William & Mary). See the complete faculty list and agenda…
SCOTUS Grants Cert: Does Nollan/Dolan Apply To Cash Exactions?
This just in: our Pacific Legal Foundation colleagues have informed us that the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review another takings case.
The questions presented are:
1. Whether the government can be held liable for a taking when it refuses to issue a land-use permit on the sole basis that the permit applicant did…
A Microcosm Of Hawaii Land Use Law
If you need another reminder of what land use and zoning law looks like on Kauai in practice (and, in turn, in Hawaii generally), see this article, Hanalei vs. Hanalei in The Garden Island newspaper. It’s about a proposal to develop a new resort that (not surprisingly) is “meeting staunch opposition from a rapidly growing…
BIO In SCOTUS Florida Exactions Case: Fla Supremes Ruled Only Under Fla Law
Florida land use and environmental law attorney Jake Cremer has posted the Brief in Opposition in Koontz v. St. Johs River Water Management Dist., No. 11-1447 (cert. petition filed May 30, 2012), the case asking whether the Nollan/Dolan nexus and proportionality tests apply to a land-use exaction that takes the form…
New Cert Petition: Nollan/Dolan Not Limited To Land Exactions
Here’s the cert petition in a case we’ve been following that presents a question that has divided the lower courts – do the nexus and rough proportionality tests for whether a land use exaction works a taking apply to exactions of cash, or are they limited to land exactions? In St. Johns River Water Management …
Justice Lynn “Buck” Compton
Gideon Kanner reminds us of the passing of retired California Court of Appeal Justice Lynn “Buck” Compton, famous of late for his exploits as a hard-charging paratrooper in World War II (L.A. Times story here). Gideon writes about Justice Compton’s time on the bench:
No, we aren’t going to wax lyrical about the…
Links From Today’s IMLA Regulatory Takings Webinar
Here are the links to the cases and other items discussed today at the International Municipal Lawyers Association webinar with Dan Mandelker and Dwight Merriam. Most of these cases are also in your written materials.
- 9th Circuit: California Raisins Were Not Taken (Horne v. U.S.D.A., No. 10-15270 (9th Cir. July 25, 2011))
…
ALI-ABA Annual Eminent Domain Conference, January 26-28, 2012, San Diego
Get ready, it’s that time of year again: the annual eminent domain law conferences by the American Law Institute-American Bar Association, this year to be held in San Diego from January 26-28, 2012.
Here’s the description of Eminent Domain and Land Valuation Litigation, the premiere program on condemnation law and related topics:
The power of eminent domain is being reshaped across the nation by court rulings and legislation. Much of the recent court activity and legislation has involved the controversial use, or attempted use, of eminent domain power to take private property for economic development by private parties. Redevelopment, however, is not the only fluid area in takings law. This national course of study addresses those areas where new developments in the law and procedure have and will reshape the practice. Learn what’s new in the cutting-edge areas of eminent domain law and how the practice in this field continues to evolve.
This popular and long running advanced course of study kicks off with a comprehensive update on eminent domain case law and legislation by a preeminent practitioner.
Each morning, the course focuses on hot issues and topics that affect practitioners today.
On Thursday and Friday afternoon, a dual track system addresses important substantive and practice topics in a series of breakout sessions. Registrants can learn about the key issues in substantive takings law from nationally recognized and experienced professionals. On the practice side, registrants can choose from another array of sessions chock full of practice pointers.
The course brings all the right participants together — lawyers, appraisers, condemning agencies, right-of-way professionals, and many others — to share valuable experiences and engage in healthy debate on these cutting-edge issues.
Networking opportunities are scheduled throughout the program, with breakfasts, networking breaks, a reception on Thursday afternoon, and social activities in the evenings arranged by a special Hospitality Committee. Come and meet with colleagues from around the nation, exchange ideas, enjoy the fellowship, and collect more than 16 hours of CLE credits.
This course runs concurrently with ALI-ABA’s annual Course of Study, Condemnation 101: Making the Complex Simple in Eminent Domain. This unique format allows practitioners who are new in the field of eminent domain to network with many of the nation’s most experienced condemnation lawyers, and to benefit from many of those same lawyers serving as their faculty. Special Offer: Attend Eminent Domain and Land Valuation Litigation and bring an associate to Condemnation 101 for 50% off. ADD TO CART
We’re on the faculty (“The Role of Hawaii’s Unique Property Law in the U.S. Supreme Court’s Takings Cases“with Professor David Callies), so if you attend either course, please stop by and say hi.
Continue Reading ALI-ABA Annual Eminent Domain Conference, January 26-28, 2012, San Diego
Lower Court Split On Applicablity Of Nollan/Dolan To Exactions Other Than Land Continues: West Linn Petition Denied
West Linn Corporate Park LLC v City of West Linn, No. 11-299 (petition for cert. filed Sep. 6, 2011), a petition we’ve been following that asked whether the nexus and “rough proportionality” tests for a regulatory taking in Nollan and Dolan are limited to government demands for land, has been denied.
California and…
