We’re continuing our summary of the oral arguments in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Dep’t of Environmental Protection,No. 08-11 (cert. granted. June 15, 2009), the case in which theCourt is considering the theory of “judicial takings” and whether statecourts are constrained by the Fifth Amendment if they suddenly and dramatically change stateproperty
Shoreline | CZMA
SCOTUS Oral Arguments In The Judicial Takings Case: Are “Background Principles” Of Property Law Completely Up To State Judges? (Part I)
Today, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Dep’t of Environmental Protection,No. 08-11 (cert. granted. June 15, 2009), the case in which theCourt is considering the theory of “judicial takings” and whether statecourts are constrained by the Fifth Amendment if they suddenly and dramatically change stateproperty…
Transcript Of SCOTUS Oral Arguments In The Judicial Takings Case
Posted here. More to follow after reviewing.
Oral Arguments In Judicial Takings Case: Are State Courts Bound By The Takings Clause?
On Wednesday, December 2, 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the biggest takings case of the year, Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Dep’t of Environmental Protection, No. 08-11 (cert. granted. June 15, 2009). This is the case in which the Court is considering the theory of “judicial takings”…
Cato Institute Podcast On Stop The Beach Renourishment (Judicial Takings) Case
The Cato Institute’s Ilya Shapiro discusses Stop the Beachfront Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Dep’t of Environmental Protection, No. 08-11 (cert. granted. June 15, 2009), the case being argued in the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday.
We will post a preview of the arguments, but in the meantime, check out our resource page here (includes…
Thursday’s Links
Things we were reviewing today:
- Check out the just-launched Hawaii Civil Procedure blog. It’s a welcome addition to the blogroll for Hawaii civil practitioners.
- My colleague Mark Murakami has set up a resource page for all things about the McDonald v. City of Chicago case. That’s the appeal currently being considered by the Supreme
…
Links From ABA Condemnation Committee Conference Call (11/18/2009)
Another very interesting conference call today, focusing on theupcoming arguments in the Stop the Beach Renourishment case, the New York Court of Appeals’ decision in Aspen Creek, and the New Jersey Supreme Court’s decision to review Klumpp v. Borough of Avalon. Here arethe links to some of the cases and other topics discussed…
Reply Brief: Must A Property Owner Seek A Change In The Law In Order To Ripen A Takings Claim?
Here’s the Reply Brief filed last month by the property owner in Leone v. County of Maui, No.29696,an appeal in the HawaiiIntermediate Court of Appeals which is considering, among other issues,the question of when a regulatory takings claim is ripe for reviewunder Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City…
Beachfront Taking Case (HAWICA) Oral Argument Recording
The judiciary web site has posted the recording of the November 10, 2009 Intermediate Court of Appeals oral arguments in Maunalua Bay Beach Ohana 28 v. State of Hawaii, No. 28175 (HAWICA) here (caution, it is a massive 88 MB mp3 file).
The issue in the case is whether the state, or littoral landowners…
Petitioner’s Reply Brief In SCOTUS Beachfront Takings Case
The property owners have filed their Reply Brief in Stop the Beachfront Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Dep’t of Environmental Protection, No. 08-11 (cert. granted. June 15, 2009), the case about “judicial takings” and the rights of littoral owners to accretion.
Oral arguments in the Supreme Court are set for December 2, 2009.
More about…