The local government does stuff that local governments do. Things like improve nearby roads. In doing so, they often interfere with the ingress and egress that nearby landowners enjoy.
In Clark v. City of Pembroke Pines, No. 4D18-3549 (Feb. 26, 2020), the city had many reasons for erecting concrete barriers (among them the closure
A super short one (a hair over 4 pages) from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
In Gentili v. Town of Sturbridge, No. SJC-12810 (Feb. 24, 2020), the court made short work of a property owner’s claim that an earlier Land Court verdict concluding that the town had obtained a prescriptive easement to discharge storm
We were all set to take a deeper dive into the Court of Federal Claims’s recent opinion in the “downstream” Harvey flooding cases (we could not do so at the time the opinion was issued last week because we were tied up doing real lawyer stuff), when our Reno, Nevada colleague Steve Silva (who most
They’re coming so fast, we can hardly keep up.
Today, in Castillo v. United States, No. 19-1158 (Feb. 20, 2020), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit resolved a common issue in rails-to-trails takings cases: when a property owner holds title and her deed describes the land as bordering on a
Here’s the latest in a long-running, multi-forum takings case about the development of affordable housing on the Big Island of Hawaii.
Last we saw, the District Court awarded nominal compensation ($1), after the jury concluded that the State of Hawaii took Aina Lea’s property. The parties cross-appealed: the State argues the district court should have
We’re doing lawyer things this week, so can’t do much blogging, so we’re going to just leave this here, the Court of Federal Claims’s Opinion and Order in the case seeking compensation for a taking by the “downstream” owners whose lands were flooded by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in the aftermath of Hurricane
It’s Friday (and Valentine’s Day), so we’ll make this quick, even thought this is one of those cases with a fact pattern that you just can’t digest quickly: In Day v. Idaho DOT, No. 45552 (Feb. 14, 2020), the Supreme Court of Idaho held that only the property owners at the time of the
As we briefly noted in this post, before we departed the ALI-CLE Eminent Domain and Land Valuation Litigation Conference in Nashville, we just had to stop by the subdivision that was at issue in the Williamson County litigation.
Frankly, there’s nothing especially special or noteworthy about this place, and only takings nerds will truly
Please mark your calendars and join us next Tuesday, February 11, 2020 at 12:30pm ET for the free (for members of the ABA’s Real Property, Trust and Estate Section) webinar, the monthly “Professors’ Corner.”
This one will be on the aftermath of Knick v. Township of Scott, 139 S. Ct. 2162 (2019), in which
Having just wrapped the 2020 ALI-CLE Eminent Domain and Land Valuation Litigation Conference in Nashville (very successfully, but more on that later), we could not depart the area without paying a visit to the site of the late-and-not-so-great Williamson County case, in a nearby suburb (we’ll also have more on that later, once we’re back