Eminent Domain | Condemnation

My Pacific Legal Foundation colleague and eminent domain scholar Tim Sandefur has posted an analysis of the legislation proposed by California’s redevelopment agencies in reaction to Governor Brown’s call to eliminate them (“California Redevelopment Agencies fight to defend their turf“).

Sandefur deconstructs (or should we say “redevelops”) the agencies’ claim that the bill

“Nobody’s gonna remember how long it took. They’re only gonna look and see that it was done.”

     – New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, on the use of
            eminent domain to build a basketball arena in Brooklyn

Battle for Brooklyn film poster

Earlier this year, at the annual ALI-ABA Eminent Domain law conference, filmmakers Michael Galinsky, Suki Hawley

Hartman

Update: a follow up from lawprof Steve Eagle  here.

Thanks to colleague Dwight Merriam for pointing out a recent decision that we missed from the Court of Appeals, New York’s highest court. In Uptown Holdings, LLC v. City of New York, 2011 NY Slip Op 01071 (Feb. 17, 2011), the court sua sponte

Honolulu attorney Jay Fidell (who also produces Think Tech Hawaii) writes a regular column in the Honolulu Star-Advertiser. This week, he focuses on eminent domain in “Governor must insure wind farm moves forward,” where he writes about the proposed wind farm on Molokai, and urges the state to use eminent domain

ABA_SLG Next week (May 12 – 15, 2011), the ABA Section of State & Local Government Law is meeting in Portland, Oregon.

This is our Spring Meeting (complete agenda here), and is co-sponsored by the Urban Land Institute and the American Planning Association. In addition to the business and administrative meetings (I promise, the meeting

Update: Rick Rayl adds his thoughts about the case and how California state courts might approach the issue here.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

What does a property owner have to do in order to qualify as a “prevailing party” in a federal condemnation action, such that it triggers fee shifting under the Equal Access to Justice Act

What we are reading today: