2008

To those who attended the workshop at the University of Hawaii law school, Hawaii State Historic Preservation Laws: Reclaiming the Past, Shaping the Future, thank you.  Here are links to the cases I mentioned in my presentation.

…

A very important decision today from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.  In Casitas Municipal Water District v. United States, No. 2007-5153 (Sep. 25, 2008), the court held that contractual water rights were taken when the federal government required the landowner to contruct a fish ladder and divert water in order…

“This case presents an issue of first impression in this Circuit — whether a legislative, generally applicable development condition that does not require the owner to relinquish rights in the real property, as opposed to an adjudicative land-use exaction, should be reviewed pursuant to the ad hoc standards of Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City…

The California Court of Appeals, First District (San Francisco and other Northern California counties) in Center for Biological Diversity, Inc. v. FPL Group, Inc., No. A116362 (Sep. 18, 2008) held that the “public trust” is enforceable by the public against the government, and that wildlife is subject to the trust.

The plaintiffs brought suit…

Professor Kent Schooland has posted “Eminent Domain and the Eighth Commandment,” a piece with his thoughts about the morality of condemning property and the system of “just compensation.”

Given the realities of eminent domain, perhaps we should prepare our children with relevant civics lessons for the playground. Whena gang of kids wants to…

Some interesting items from around the land use law blogosphere:

  • A write up of an Eleventh Circuit (which covers Alabama, Florida, and Georgia) decision striking down as unconstitutional a municipal ordinance that prohibited national chain retail stores because it violates the dormant Commerce Clause.  This could be a very important case on the “big box”

…