Next week, power adapters and internet connectivity permitting, we’ll be blogging from the Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference at the Tsinghua University School of Law in Beijing, People’s Republic of China.
Admin note: We’ve added “Brigham-Kanner Conference” as a separate category to catalog the posts related to the Conference. In order to read all of the
No, it’s not another land use blog as you can tell from the title.
But it is another blog by a law firm colleague, one of the best in the immigration and naturalization business, David McCauley.
David joins the other Damon Key bloggers, Mark Murakami (hawaiioceanlaw.com), Tred Eyerly (insurancelawhawaii.com), and
Yes, you read that right.
Yesterday, we posted most of the amici briefs in Sackett v. EPA, No. 10-1062, the case in which Idaho property owners are asserting their right to challenge the EPA’s assertion that a portion of their land are “wetlands.” But we saved one for a separate post, because it was
Thanks to the folks at the Environmental Law Institute, who have allowed us to reprint an article from a recent Environmental Law Reporter by William W. Wade, Ph.D., a resource economist with the firm Energy and Water Economics (Columbia, Tennessee). Bill is a frequent author and speaker on the Penn Central issue, and he’s
Last week, the petitioners filed their merits brief in Sackett v. EPA, No. 10-1062, the case in which Idaho property owners are asserting their right to challenge the EPA’s assertion that a portion of their land are “wetlands.”
A multitude of amicus briefs have been filed to support the Sackett’s arguments. We haven’t had
Some day, the Court will grant cert in another eminent domain case.
But today is not that day.
The Court declined to review C & J Coupe Family Ltd. P’ship v. County of Hawaii, No. 11-75, the petition that asked, after Kelo, when is eminent domain pretextual? We represent the petitioner, and