Here’s the latest in a case we’ve been following closely. (We won’t be commenting much, because it is one of ours.)
In The Coalition for Fairness in Soho and Noho, Inc. v. City of New York, No. 112 (Jan. 13, 2026), the New York Court of Appeals (dun-dun) held that
New York City
This is going to be a short post, mostly because the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in KOGAP Ent., Inc. v. City of Medford, No 24-5268 (Nov. 13, 2025) is itself short.
Before we go further, this disclosure: this is one of ours, and our Pacific Legal Foundation colleague Brian
When government enters the pharmaceutical market as a participant, it naturally changes the dynamics. But when Congress does this, is it a taking?
Medicare Part D is a voluntary prescription drug benefit program for Medicare beneficiaries. When Congress first created Part D in 2003, it barred the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) from
Heads up on a new article of interest to those of us who deal with exactions and Nollan/Dolan: Matthew Baker, Much Ado About Nollan/Dolan: The Comparative Nature of the Legislative Adjudication Distinctions in Exactions, 42 Urban Lawyer 171 (2010). Here’s a summary:
Much has been made, by both commentators and
To all those who attended today’s sessions on Practical Guide to Land Use and Zoning, thank you.
Here is the upcoming attorney’s fee case in the US Supreme Court that I mentioned, the Hawaii fee-shifting statute in cases of “development” without a permit in environmental matters, and California’s Ehrlich v. City of Culver City