Eminent Domain | Condemnation

Several items of interest:

  • California Coastal Commission: “You must farm” – As a condition of allowing a Northern California family to build a home, the California Coastal Commission demanded that they dedicate an “agricultural easement” on their 143-acre parcel.  In other words, as a condition of use, the Commission requires a family that has never

Thank you to those who were able to join us live for today’s teleconference. Here are the links to the additional cases and other items I mentioned (or wanted to mention) in my session on Public Use and Pretext Update:

Thank you to those who were able to join us live for today’s teleconference. Here are the links to the additional cases and other items I mentioned (or wanted to mention) in my session on Public Use and Pretext Update:

Our thanks to Robert S. Poliner, the Connecticut Ombudsman for Property Rights for permitting us to republish his review of Jeff Benedict’s Little Pink House – A True Story of Defiance and Courage (Grand Central Publishing 2009) (available from Amazon here), the recently published book about the infamous U.S. Supreme Court eminent domain

There’s still time to register for two teleconferences that are a part of the ABA State and Local Government Section’s “Virtual Spring Meeting.”  I hope you can join us for at least one of the programs.

  • Wednesday, April 1, 2:00 – 3:30 pm, EDT: Condemnation Hot Topics – The program will examine new and important

Following up on this story, West Hawaii Today reports “Attorneys argue against Supreme Court ruling on bypass,” about whether a second attempt to condemn property ostensibly for a road ispretextual when the court determined the first attempt was unconstitutional and nothing changed:

Attorneys for the Richards family and theCoupe Trust, in documents