Last year, we attended a conference devoted to the future of regulatory takings, hosted by the Antonin Scalia School of Law (George Mason U), and Pacific Legal Foundation.
The publisher, the Journal of Law, Economics, and Policy has released the articles and essays from that conference, and made them available here.
Here’s the list of articles:
- Michael M. Berger, Juries for Takings Liability: Treating Litigants Alike
- Ethan W. Blevins, Cyber Takings: A Preliminary Study of Regulating Takings of Virtual Spaces
- Eric R. Claeys, Takings and Choice of Law After Tyler v. Hennepin County
- Emily Cruikshank Bayonne and Wesley M. Davenport, Counting Costs: the Institutional Effects of Regulatory Takings
- Emily Hamilton and Charles Gardner, Legislative Responses to the Regulatory Takings Conundrum
- Brian T. Hodges and Deborah J. La Fetra, Sheetz v. County of El Dorado: Legislatures Must Comply With the Takings Clause
- Donald J. Kochan, Involuntary Regulatory Servitudes: Correcting for “Regulatory Takings” Terminology
- Adam J. MacLeod, A Workable Common Law Baseline for Regulatory Takings
- Sam Spiegelman, Penance for Penn Central: How to Treat Property Rights Properly
These are all worth your time to read. Our favorites? Berger on juries, Kochan on terminology, MacLeod on common law. But don’t overlook the others, for sure.