When does a party who loses a petition for rehearing actually win it?
In Bywaters v. United States, No. 2011-1032 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 1, 2012) an opinion we detailed here, a 2-1 panel of the Federal Circuit held that the property owner’s request for attorneys fees under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Remember the case from late last year in which the Honolulu Star-Advertiser brought a freedom of information/open records lawsuit against the Hawaii governor to force him to disclose the names of judicial nominees? Abandoning the practice of his two predecessors, the Governor refused to release the list of names of nominees transmitted to him by
No, not another case from the Hawaii courts, but from an island further afield, Saipan in the Northern Mariana Islands.
We were going to do a write-up of Commonwealth v. Lot No. 353 New G, No. 2012-MP-06 (CNMI June 28, 2012), but Gideon Kanner beat us to it. Read the opinion, and his
Today, on behalf of Owners’ Counsel of America, we filed this amicus brief in Arkansas Game & Fish Comm’n v. United States, No. 11-597 (cert. granted Apr. 2, 2012), the case in which the Federal Circuit held that flooding caused by the Corps of Engineers was only temporary, and did not result in
Just published: the ABA Section of Litigation (Condemnation, Zoning, and Land Use Committee) has released The Law of Eminent Domain — A Fifty State Survey (First Chair Press 2012). This book is a “single resource for eminent domain practitioners … a reference for questions about eminent domain and condemnation procedure in every state and the
Those disappointed by the Supreme Court’s decision in the ACA cases have searched for a silver lining in an otherwise devastating defeat: five justices would prohibit the Commerce power from reaching inaction, a Machiavellian CJ Roberts took the long view, that this is the Chief’s Marbury v. Madison moment. Yeah, other than that
In Eminent Domain and the Obamacare Decision, Gideon Kanner also looks for the eminent domain angle in the recent opinions on the legality, vel non, of the ACA. In particular, he challenges the casual assetion in Justice Ginsburg’s opinion that eminent domain an “unwanted sale,” that there is such a thing as an