In Brescia v. North Shore Ohana(No. 27211, July 12, 2007), the Hawaii Supreme Court held that a property owner was not entitled to rely upon a county planning commission’s determination of the location of a shoreline setback when the planning commission retained the authority to give official assurances. The case involved Kauai property within the coastal “Special Management Area.” The SMA is, generally speaking, the land nearest the shoreline, as defined in Hawaii’s Coastal Zone Management Act, Haw. Rev. Stat. ch. 205A. The CZMA established special controls for this strip of land, and thecounties have authority to regulate uses within the SMA, including thelocation of the “shoreline setback,” which is (like other setbacks) anunbuildable zone that “sets back” structures from the shoreline. The statewide minimum setback is established by the CZMA, but the individual counties are permitted to establish greater setbacks, which vary from county-to-county. More here.