2007

“In a democracy, the people get the government they deserve” states the old dictum.  That pretty much sums up one response to The Wall Street Journal story This Side of Paradise about the “Ohana Kauai” property tax charter amendment case.  A WSJ reader proposes: “It’s Simple: Vote Them Out.”

The need to

The Wall Street Journal (Sep. 1, 2007)

This Side of Paradise

By MALIA ZIMMERMAN
September 1, 2007; Page A6

KAUAI, Hawaii — The island of Kauai has long been a magnet for visitors from the mainland as well as the main island. With white sand beaches and turquoise blue water, the island on the northern

The Wall Street Journal posts “This Side of Paradise,” about the “Ohana Kauai” property tax Charter Amendment case, County of Kauai ex rel. Nakazawa v. Baptiste, No. 27351 (Aug. 6, 2007). 

Inthat 3-2 decision, the Hawaii Supreme Court over a vociferous dissent,held that friendly government officials have standing to manufacturelawsuits against

Nineteen months after the briefing was completed, but only several days before the Superferry was scheduled to commence operation, the Hawaii Supreme Court issued a unanimous order, holding that the State’s decision to exempt the improvements to Kahului Harbor necessary for the Superferry’s operation from an environmental assessment was erroneous.  The Order noted that

The Maui News reports that Maui’s “workforce housing” ordinance has been challenged:

Lawyers for a Canadian condominium developer, who is seeking to buildtwo multiunit projects in the Kamaole area, are seeking a court orderto block the county from implementing the law that the developer saysis defective.

The lawsuit alleges the housing policy adopted by the