Municipal & Local Govt law

ABA_SLGThere’s still time to register for tomorrow’s teleconference on Ethics for Municipal Attorneys: Reconciling the Rules of Professional Conduct with Government Ethics Law (a live webinar and teleconference which starts at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time). More information, including registration, here. This program is sponsored by the ABA Continuing Legal Education Center and the Section…

Here’s the last brief in Filarksy v. Delia, No. 10-1018 (cert. granted Sep. 27, 2011), the case involving the immunities that lawyers may be entitled to claim in civil rights actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We filed an amicus brief in the case on behalf of the American Bar Association. The other…

Here’s what we’re reading today:

  • Blight barons of redevelopment plot comeback – Steven Greenhut (O.C. Register): “As of February, anyway, redevelopment is dead in California, the victim of an absurdly arrogant legal and political strategy pursued by redevelopment’s chief defenders. This is wonderful news, made even better by the teeth-gnashing of public officials

…

California followers: be sure to register and join in on Wednesday, January 4, 2012, starting at 2:00 p.m. PST as Rick Rayl, Brad Kuhn (California Eminent Domain Report) and their firm colleagues present a webinar, “Supreme Court Upholds Elimination of Redevelopment in California – Now What?“

This, of course, refers to…

Battle for Brooklyn film poster

Today was the Hawaii premiere of Battle For Brooklyn, the Oscar-shortlisted documentary film about the Atlantic Yards case. We’re introducing the film and conducting a question-and-answer session after each showing.

Screening information: Tuesday and Wednesday, January 3 and 4, at 1:00 p.m. and 7:30 p.m. each day at the Doris Duke Theater. More …

The Honolulu Star-Advertiser published my movie review of “Battle For Brooklyn,” the documentary about the Atlantic Yards eminent domain fight, on the op-ed page. Check it out here or below. More importantly, if you are in Honolulu next week, come to one of the four screenings (details and link to ticket purchase below).…

Today’s 6-1 California Supreme Court opinion in California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos, No. S194861 (Dec. 29, 2011) brings to mind two of our favorite loanwords: schadenfreude (deriving pleasure from the misfortune of others) and schlimmbesserung (to worsen by improvement).

The first because we can’t say we’re crying much about the takedown of California redevelopment…

As we noted earlier today (“Cal Supreme Court “Redevelops” Redevelopment Agencies“), the California Supreme Court has dealt a stunning blow to the redevelopment-industrial compex in California. Here’s more from media outlets and legal commentators:

  • Governor Jerry Brown issues his shortest press release, ever: “Today’s ruling by the California Supreme Court validates a key

…

In what can only be considered a major takedown of the redevelopment game, the California Supreme Court in a 6-1 opinion (Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye concurring and dissenting), held that the state legislature could eliminate redevelopment agencies without violating the California Constitution. What the lege giveth, the lege may taketh away. It upheld the statute dissolving…

As we predicted in our oral argument preview, the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals made short work of the issues in City & County of Honolulu v. Sherman, No. 28945 (Dec. 27, 2011). Just two weeks after oral argument, the court issued its opinion (unpublished; again, not a surprise).

The court concluded that…