It’s not often that you see an opinion piece previewing an attorney’s arguments in a pending case being published before his or her brief has been filed. Most commonly, if counsel publishes in the op-ed pages about a case, it is afterthe brief has been filed or after the court has rendered adecision. Thus, the
Equal Protection
HAWSCT: Separation of Powers Prohibits Legislative Transfer of Agency’s Regulatory Fees to General Fund
How often in an appellate opinion does the court use the term “glom?”
[The Appellee] gloms onto the “police power” aspect of the definition [of regulatory fees] in arguing that “Medeiros plainly concern[ed] the ‘police power’ of ‘criminal investigative services,’ not a user fee as suggested by [the state].”
No matter what you may…
Cal. Court of Appeals: Extension of Ordinance Allows New Inverse Condemnation Challenge
When must a landowner challenge a land use regulation she claims illegally impact her property? Talk to a lawyer, and they’re usually going to say that you should act sooner than later, and often the time limitations are very short. Under California law, for example, facial challenges to a zoning ordinance must be brought within…
Final Amicus Brief Supporting the State of Hawaii in Ceded Lands Case
The State of Washington, along with 31 others have filed an amicus brief in support of the State of Hawaii in the ceded lands case (available here) which argues:
The amicus curiae states are deeply concerned with the lower court’s conclusion that the Apology Resolution creates or recognizes claims that cloud the title to…
Federal Government in Ceded Lands Case: Sorry Seems To Be The Hardest Word
In a significant development and unexpected move, the Solicitor General has filed in the U.S. Supreme Court an amicus brief on behalf of the United States strongly supporting the State of Hawaii’s position in the ceded lands case, asserting the Apology Resolution was “hortatory, not substantive,” and that the ceded lands trust is supposed to…
Ceded Lands Case: Federal Government Files Amicus Supporting Hawaii
In an significant development, on December 11, 2008, the Solicitor General filed an amicus brief in the ceded lands case now pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. We’ll post the brief shortly. The federal government’s participation was not expected.
This amicus brief has the potential to influence the Court, as the Solicitor General is sometimes…
SCOTUS Ceded Lands Case: Another Amicus Brief
The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii and the Southeastern Legal Foundation filed an amicus brief in the Hawaii ceded lands case, available here. The brief argues:
Hawaii is justly admired as an integrated, racially blended society. It has been called a model for the rest of the country, perhaps for the world. But some people…
More Amicus Briefs in SCOTUS Ceded Lands Case
The brief of the Commissioner of Public Lands for the State of New Mexico is posted here. The brief of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence is posted here.
The New Mexico brief explains:
Because the express trust created under the Hawaii Admission Act was based on principles established in the New Mexico and…
Ceded Lands Case: Pacific Legal Foundation, Cato Institute, Center for Equal Opportunity Amicus Brief
Today, we filed an amicus brief in the ceded lands case on behalf of Pacific Legal Foundation, the Cato Institute, and the Center for Equal Opportunity, available here.
The core issue of this case is whether a state court, interpreting federal law, may enjoin the State of Hawaii from exercising its sovereign authority to…
Ceded Lands Case: Mountain States Legal Foundation Amicus Brief
The Mountain States Legal Foundation, “a nonprofit, public-interest law firm . . . dedicated to bringing before the courts those issues vital to the defense and preservation of individual liberties, the right to own and use property, the free enterprise system, and limited and ethical government” today filed an amicus brief in the Hawaii ceded…
