Update: the audio recording is posted here.
* * * *
Here are the links to the cases we mentioned in today’s ABA State and Local Government Law Section presentation, “Takings: Emerging Issues.”
The “Larger Parcel” In Regulatory Takings (and Eminent Domain)
- Argument Preview from SCOTUSblog
- Affirmed by an Equally Confused Court? Murr Oral Argument Report
- Murr oral argument recording
- Murr oral argument transcript
Emerging Issues
- Sixth Circuit: Federal Takings Plaintiffs Must Go To the Court Of Federal Claims, Not Entitled To Jury Trial
- SCOTUS Intervention and Standing In Takings (And Other) Cases
- Standing vs. “Property” In Takings Claims – Federal Circuit
- Rewriting the Common Law – Nies v. Emerald Isle (NC) (cert petition here)
- Legislative Exactions – Exempt From Nollan/Dolan/Koontz? (CA) (amicus briefs here)
- Quasi-legislative Exaction Is Subject to Nexus and Proportionality Tests (FL)
- Police Power Takings (SC)
- Palazzolo and Change of Ownership and Regulations as Background Principles (NY)
- Sharing Economy Takings (WI, IL)
Flooding and Takings
- Virginia Supreme Court Clarifies How To Plead A Flooding Inverse Condemnation Claim
- Golf Course Owners Who Recorded Title After The Taking, Had Standing (MO)
- Oregon: Physical Inverse Condemnation Claim Is Ripe From Moment Of Occupation
- Katrina Flooding (LA)
Williamson County Ripeness
- Michiganders: Go Ahead, File Your Federal Regulatory Takings Claims In Federal Court
- Federal Circuit: Williamson County Ripeness Not Required In Facial Takings Claims
- Removal and Williamson County Ripeness