Voting rights | election law

Following up on a recent post about a possible legal challenge to Hawaii’s system of “open” primaries: the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (Maryland, W. Virginia, Virginia, North and South Carolina) has denied rehearing/en banc review to a panel decision declaring Virginia’s open primary unconstitutional.  Circuit Judge Wilkinson dissents in a detailed…

In August, by a3-2 vote, the Hawaii Supreme Court determined that the term “county” inarticle VIII, section 3 of the Hawaii Constitution means “countycouncils.”  The majority held that only county councils may establish property tax policies, and that voters of the county have no power to do so directly by amending their county charter. 

The…

A “SLAPP suit” is a “strategic lawsuit against public participation,” and many states have statutes designed to thwart retaliatory lawsuits to protect the public’s willingness to exercise First Amendment rights.  For example, California’s statute defines SLAPP suits as:

lawsuits brought primarily to chill the valid exercise of the constitutional rights of freedom of speech and…

Jay Fidell at ThinkTech Hawaii (Hawaii Public Radio KIPO-FM89.3) posts the podcasts of UH Law School dean and professor Avi Soifer’s appearance on the topic of “Pushing the constitutional envelope – how quickly, if at all, can it snap back.”  It’s not about land use and related topics, but worth listening nonetheless for anyone interested in the role of the courts in protecting constitutional rights. 

Sidebar: One of the more interesting law review articles I’ve read lately is Dean Soifer’s Courting Anarchy, 82 Boston U. L. Rev. 699 (2002), which criticized the U.S. Supreme Court’s Bush v. Goredecision, and analyzed the corrosive effect on judicial legitimacy whencourts make nakedly political decisions.  Speaking of that case, The WallStreet Journal’s law blog has this interesting tidbit: Continue Reading ▪ Podcast: UH Law School Dean on “Pushing the Constitutional Envelope” (mp3)

“In a democracy, the people get the government they deserve” states the old dictum.  That pretty much sums up one response to The Wall Street Journal story This Side of Paradise about the “Ohana Kauai” property tax charter amendment case.  A WSJ reader proposes: “It’s Simple: Vote Them Out.”

The need to…

The Wall Street Journal posts “This Side of Paradise,” about the “Ohana Kauai” property tax Charter Amendment case, County of Kauai ex rel. Nakazawa v. Baptiste, No. 27351 (Aug. 6, 2007). 

Inthat 3-2 decision, the Hawaii Supreme Court over a vociferous dissent,held that friendly government officials have standing to manufacturelawsuits against…

Kauai’s newspaper posts “Ohana amendment decision the result of classic Hawaii politics,” a commentary by Walter Lewis, one of the Kauai homeowners who intervened in the County vs. County lawsuit, an effort by county officials to strike down a voter-enacted property tax relief charter amendment.

The typical lawsuit involves a realcontroversy between …

My thanks to Sandy Brodie and Karlos deTreaux for having me on their “Kauai Soapbox” program today on KKCR-FM 92.7, where we discussed the “Ohana Kauai” property tax charter amendment case and recent decision by the Hawaii Supreme Court.

Stream the podcast here (1 hr):

Or download the podcast here (52mb mp3).