Voting rights | election law

Today’s Honolulu Star-Advertiser runs the editorial Perk of incumbency: Unequal time, about Hawaii’s “resign to run” requirement (article II, section 7 of the Hawaii Constitution), particularly the interplay with equal time in broadcast media:

The cynic might say that elected officials are candidates every day of their working lives. Attorney Robert Thomas, who admits


What we’re looking at and listening to today. Some video, some podcasts.

  • A clip about the owner of what might be “the most condemned property in America.” It features a Virginia rancher whose property

This just in: in a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Acoba, the Hawaii Supreme Court held that a Maui council member immediately forfeits office should the council member violate the continuous residency requirements of Maui Charter § 3-3.  DeJetley v. Kahoohalahala, No. 29919 (Feb. 10, 2010). The court held that section 3-3 could be

Today, we filed the Reply Brief in DeJetley v. Kahoohalahala, No. 29929, the appeal now pending in the Hawaii Supreme Court regarding the Lanai member of the Maui Council who is alleged to not be a resident of Lanai as required by the county charter.

Section 3-3 of the Charterprovides that “If a council

Here’s the Answering Brief filed by a Maui Councilmember in the case in which Lanai residents and voters assert he forfeited the Lanai seat on the Maui County Council under section 3-3 of the Maui Charter since he is not a resident of Lanai.

Section 3-3 of the Charterprovides that “If a council member…ceases to

Update: the Hawaii Supreme Court’s unanimous opinion affirming that “immedeately forfeit” means the circuit court has the power to declare that a council seat is vacant, is here.

Yesterday, we filed the Opening Brief on behalf of Lanai residents and voters in their appeal from the Maui circuit court’s dismissal of their complaint that

The recording of the oral argument in Dupree v. Hiraga, No 29464 has been posted. It is available here (caution, massive 34mb mp3 download). (Oral arguments in Hawaii’s appellate courts are not reduced to a written transcript, and the electronic recordings are the only record of arguments.)

The appeal concerns whether the State Board