« ▪ More on Wilkie v. Robbins - Where to go When Government Goes Wild | Main | ▪ Maui Sued in Federal Court for Vacation Rental Policies »

September 27, 2007

▪ Court Strikes Delegation of Eminent Domain and Reimbursement to Private Party

You can read the court's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order here.

I won't be commenting on this decision since my colleagues Ken Kupchak, Mark Murakami and I are the attorneys for the property owner, but the statement of the family that owns the land is below.

# # # #

Circuit Judge Ronald Ibarra has decided in favor of a local Kona family, ruling that the County of Hawaii illegally sold its power of eminent domain to Scottsdale, Arizona-based luxury developer Hokulia.  In the County-Hokulia Development Agreement, the County allowed Hokulia to control what property would be seized, permitted Hokulia's lawyers to threaten the Richards Family and its neighbors, and forced the County to bring lawsuits against its own citizens to take their property. 

The court ruled that the County-Hokulia Development Agreement violated state law because it illegally transferred the County's power to take the property by eminent domain to Hokulia.  The Richards Family's property was targeted by the developer for its "Hokulia Bypass," a road connecting the "luxury golf course real estate development project" to Mamalahoa Highway. 
 
The court struck down the first of the County's multiple attempts to take a portion of the Richards Family's property for the Bypass because the County "did not have a proper public purpose."  The court found "[i]f the government attempts to delegate its power of eminent domain to a private party in an agreement whereby the developer controls what property is taken and pays for all expenses, and the private party is able to demand the government institute eminent domain proceedings against other private property owners, then the attempted delegation is illegal and void." 
 
The court also invalided the portion of the County-Hokulia agreement that would have required the Richards Family and their Onouli neighbors to reimburse Hokulia for the cost of the road. 
 
Under the judge's ruling, however, the County will be able to build the Bypass since a second attempt to take the property did not suffer the same legal defects as the first.  The court awarded the Richards Family over $200,000 in compensation for the taking of their land.
 
"These cases were never about whether another road is needed in Kona," said Richards Family spokesman Charles Coupe.  "Our family fought for our rights and the rights of our neighbors because we couldn't believe that the County could sell governmental powers to the highest bidder.  It didn't seem right that the County could agree to allow Hokulia to take our property for Hokulia's road, and then pass back the cost of the road to us." 
 
After Hokulia directed the County to start eminent domain process in October 2000, the Richards Family called upon Kenneth Kupchak, Robert Thomas, and Mark Murakami, the legal team at Honolulu-based Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert (www.hawaiilawyer.com), to protect their rights in court. 
 
"It has been a long fight, but it has been worth it," said Coupe, "Our family knew this wasn't right, and we would stand up for our rights and our neighbors' rights again, if necessary."
 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451707369e200e54eeaf4a58833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference ▪ Court Strikes Delegation of Eminent Domain and Reimbursement to Private Party:

Comments

It is my understanding that the Coupe's have filed an appeal of Judge Ibarra's decision
allowing this much needed roadway to be completed.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

this blog is...

  • devoted to recent developments and commentary on regulatory takings, eminent domain, inverse condemnation, property rights, and Hawaii land use law

Author

Search


  • web
    inversecondemnation.com


events | notices

  • All upcoming and past seminars, conferences, and events here

    May 14, 2009


    Along with my Damon Key colleague Christi-Anne Kudo Chock, I was on the faculty of Integrating Water Law and Land Use Planning in Hawaii in Honolulu. Materials and links from my session on "Water Rights, Property Rights, and the Law of Settled Expectations" here

    April 1-2 2009


    As part of its mid-year meeting, the ABA State and Local Government Section sponsored two teleconferences on eminent domain and land use. In the first, Condemnation Hot Topics, I discussed recent decisions about public use and pretext. Links from that discussion are posted here. In the second, Hot Topics in Land Use Law, I went into further detail on the public use issue; links from that discussion are posted here.

    February 20, 2009


    Our firm's annual land use seminar, Zoning, Subdivision and Land Development Law. Materials from my session on "Supreme Court, Regulatory Takings and Eminent Domain Update" here

    January 15-16, 2009


    I was on the faculty at the Hawaii Land Use Law Conference, and spoke about "Emerging Water Issues." My materials are posted here

add IC to your site

latest hawaii appellate opinions

recent posts from hawaiioceanlaw

recent posts from insurance law hawaii

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Disclaimer

  • This blog is not legal advice. But you knew that already. Reading this blog does not make you a client, nor are any posts or comments on this blog subject to the attorney-client privilege. For legal advice, please retain an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

    This blog is not sponsored by the author's firm, and the views expressed by the author are just that; they are not the views of his clients, his firm or its clients, or anyone but for the author.

    © 2005-2009. All rights reserved.

Blog powered by TypePad