Iin North Mill Street, LLC v. City of Aspen, No. 20-1130 (July 27, 2021), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit held that a claim that the city’s denial of a rezoning application to allow residential development effected a taking was not ripe because the city’s process also allows a property owner
Dream Job Alert: Con Law Fellow @PacificLegal
Heads up, property rights law nerds: looking at a career in public interest law? Here’s your chance for a one-year gig as a Constitutional Law Fellow at Pacific Legal Foundation.
You will be a “PLF Fellow,” a one-year position for law-school graduates. You will be added to litigation teams in on-going cases, receive hands-on
New L Rev Article: “Givens v. Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC and the Unresolved Circuit Split” (Tex. A. & M. J. Prop. L.)
Programming note: as we noted here, we’ve recently moved our email subscribers to a new service. If you are already subscribed to our email updates you should not need to do anything, except look for the emails coming from Feedblitz, not Feedburner. If you want to sign up for email updates anew
Cedar Point Part VI: What Others Are Saying
Talk amongst yourselves.
We’ve had our say, so in this post — the sixth and final post in a series of deeper dives about June’s U.S. Supreme Court opinion in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid , No. 20-107 (June 23, 2021) — we’re linking to what others are saying about the case.
Here are all
Podcasts
We don’t have our own regular podcast (should we?) but have had the privilege of appearing on others’ podcasts, and have posted our own audio from time-to-time. Here’s a list:
- We Pay A Return Visit To The Eminent Domain Podcast To Talk Takings
- In Which We Return To The Pendulum Land Podcast To
Admin Note For Email & RSS Subscribers: Feedburner Is Dead – Long Live Feedblitz
A note for those of you who subscribe to the blog for email updates and notifications. Our longstanding email feed distributor, Feedburner (by Google) has announced that it is spinning down, and will no longer provide subscriptions and updates to blogs by email.
As a consequence, as of today, Friday, July 23, 201, we’ve
Cedar Point Part V: Help Us Help You
In this post — the fifth and penultimate post in a series of deeper dives that we’re posting about June’s U.S. Supreme Court opinion in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, No. 20-107 (June 23, 2021) — we’ll be trying to take some educated guesses about what the decision means for the future.
Here are
Canada Supreme Court To Review De Facto Expropriation (aka Regulatory Takings) Case
Here’s one we’re now following, thanks to a heads-up from a northern colleague.
The Supreme Court of Canada has granted leave to appeal in a case involving what Canadian law calls “de facto expropriation” (what we’d call “regulatory takings”).
Before you review the Application for Leave to Appeal by the property owner, and the
NY App Div: If Deposit Exceeds Adjudicated Compensation, Owner May Be Liable To Pay The Difference
The State of New York needed a strip of the owner’s property for a “greenway” for walkers and bikers. The State and the owner agreed that if the owner believed that the advance payment of $300k was not enough, it could ask the Court of Claims for more. But they also agreed that if that
El Tribunal Supremo De Puerto Rico: Evidence Of Environmental Contamination Is Admissible In Eminent Domain Valuation
We’re not going to pretend that we can actually read what the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico’s opinion in Administración de Terrenos de Puerto Rico v. Ponce Bayland Enterprises, Inc., No. CC-2019-212 (June 29, 2021) says. It’s in Spanish and we don’t know Spanish. Wish we did, truly.
But hey, that’s what Google Translate