Check out this NYT story on a $12.4m verdict in a Connecticut eminent domain abuse case.
A vast majority of cases challenging such takings are resolved through injunctions; takings temporarily halted by court injunction are often abandoned. But because Judge DeMayo had granted New England Estates and the landowners the right to seek a claim for damages, this case took a different path: The developer and landowners took it to trial, alleging a violation of their civil rights under the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment and seeking lost profits.
Mr. Hollister, the developer’s lawyer, maintained that town officials had made up reasons to take the land simply to stave off development.
Unlike the City of New London, which exercised its power of eminent domain after a “fair, public and factual” process, Mr. Hollister said, Branford pursued a process “so unfair and distorted as to violate the Constitution.”
The jury agreed, awarding New England Estates $11.2 million in lost profits plus $1.2 million for expenses already incurred on the project. The jurors also awarded $340,000 to the landowners for lost option payments.